Structured Bible Study Methods

Friday, August 29, 2008

Which Law Are We Under? --- A Bible Study

by Don French

IS THE LAW OF MOSES STILL IN EFFECT?

Galatians 4:21-31
    1) Which law did the bondwoman and her son represent?

    2) Which law did the freewoman and her son represent?

    3) Which son represents Christians?

    4) What was to be done with the bondwoman and her son?

    5) Which son was to inherit everything?


Jeremiah 31:31
1) What Did Jerimiah say about a “new covenant”?

Matthew 5:17-18
    1) Did Christ come to destroy the law of Moses?

    2) What was Christ’s purpose?

    3) Could any of the old law be taken away before all of it was fulfilled?
Colossians 2:14
    1) Was the old law against us?

    2) Was the handwriting of ordinances contrary to us?

    3)
    When was the law of Moses taken away?
Hebrews 8:6-7 & 10:8-10

    1) Can you see the concept of two laws here?

    2) Which law was better?

    3) Which law was established upon better promises?

    4) Which law has Christ as it’s mediator?

    5) Was this “new covenant” made through the sacrifice of Christ on the cross?

    6) What happened to the “old covenant”?

    7) Which covenant are we now under?

Hebrews 7:11-14
    1) Could perfection come by the Levitical priesthood?

    2) Which priesthood was Christ called after?

    3)
    What had to be done for Christ to become a high priest after the order of Melchizedek?

Hebrews 10:9
    1) Did Christ take away the old law?

    2) Did Christ establish a second law?

    3) Was this the will of God?

Hebrews 9:15-17
    1) By what means did Christ establish the New Testament?

    2) Was Christ’s death necessary for a change in the law?


WHAT WAS THE PURPOSE
OF THE OLD LAW?

Galatians 3:24-25
    1) What was the purpose of the old law?

    2) Are we now under the schoolmaster, the old law?


Romans 15:4
    1) Why was the old law written?

    2) Should we study the old law?

Hebrews 10:1
    1) What did the old law contain?

    2) Could the old law make us perfect?

2 Timothy 3:16-17
    1) Can the new law make us perfect?

    2) Which law do we wish to follow?


SUMMARY
IS THE LAW OF MOSES STILL IN EFFECT?
    1) The Law from Moses is represented by the Bondwoman. (Galatians 4:21-31)

    2) The New Testament is represented by the Freewoman. (Galatians 4:21-31)

    3) Those who follow the Old Testament are represented by the Bondwoman’s son. (Galatians 4:21-31)

    4) Christians are represented by the son of the Freewoman.(Galatians 4:21-31)

    5) Those who follow the Old Testament receive no inheritance at all. (Galatians 4:21-31)

    6) Christians will inherit everything from God. (Galatians 4:21-31)

    7) The handwriting of ordinances was against human nature. (Colossians 2:13-14)

    8) The Law of Moses was contrary to us. (Colossians 2:13-14)

    9) The Old Law was taken away when Jesus was nailed to the cross. (Colossians 2:13-14)

    10) The New Testament is better than the Old Testament.(Hebrews 8:6-7)

    11) The New Testament was established upon better promises. (Hebrews 8:6-7)

    12) Jesus Christ was the mediator of the New Testament. (Hebrews 8:6-7)

    13) Jesus did not come to destroy the Law of Moses, but to fulfill it. (Matthew 5:17-18)

    14) Either all the Old Testament is in effect or none of it is. (Hebrews 8:6-7)

    15) Before Jesus could become High Priest, the Law of Moses had to be changed.(Hebrews 7:11-22)

    16) Jesus came to take away the Old Law and establish a New Law. (Hebrews 10:8-10)

    17) It was the will of God that this happen. (Hebrews 10:9)

    18) Jesus had to die to fulfill the Law of Moses and bring in a new covenant. (Hebrews 9:15-28)

    19) The death of Jesus was necessary for the New Testament to come into effect. (Hebrews 9:15-28)

WHAT WAS THE PURPOSE
OF THE LAW OF MOSES?
    1) The purpose of the Law of Moses was to lead the world to Jesus. (Galatians 3:24-25)

    2) The Old Testament contains a shadow of the New Testament. (Hebrews 8:4-6; 10:1)

    3) By studying the Old Testament, we can better understand the New Testament. (Romans 4:23; 15:4)

    4) The Old Testament was written for our learning. (Romans 4:23; 15:4)

    5) The Old Testament could never make its followers perfect.(2 Timothy 3:16-17)
    6) We do not study the Old Law to find commandments that we still obey. (Romans 4:23; 15:4)

    7) We study the Old Testament to see how God feels about obedience to commandments. (Romans 4:23; 15:4-6)


Further study:
2 Chronicles 34:14; Matthew 26:28;; Luke 22:20; 2 Cor 3:6,14; Hebrews 7:11-12; 9:15-20; Romans 7:4,7; Exodus 24:12; 34:27-8;

WHAT CAN YOU DO?
You can accept the authority of Christ by doing what He commanded (Matthew 7:21; John 14:15; 15:10-14; Luke 6:46). Notice the pattern for becoming a Christian as revealed in the Scriptures. The Gospel was heard, resulting in faith (Romans 10:17). Repentance of (turning away from) sin (Acts 17:30) and confession of Jesus as the Son of God followed (Romans 10:10). Believers were baptized INTO Christ for the remission (forgiveness) of sins (See Galatians 3:27; Colossians 2:12; Acts 2:38; 22:16; Mark 16:16; Romans 6:3-5; 1 Peter 3:20-21), and added to His church (Acts 2:47). Christians were taught to be faithful even to the point of death (Revelation 2:10).

WE WELCOME YOU
Following the instructions of the Scriptures, members of Christ’s body [collectively called the “churches of ChristRomans 16:16),] assemble as congregations for worship, encouragement, and Bible study. The congregation in your community welcomes you to investigate the Bible with us. With a spirit of brotherly love we would seek to reconcile any differences by following the Bible ONLY. We recognize the Bible as God’s inspired word, the ONLY reliable standard of faith and practice. We desire the unity for which Christ prayed and which the Bible emphasizes in the expression, “one Lord, one faith, one baptism.” Together we seek to maintain “the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.”

A friendly welcome awaits you. We do not wish to embarrass you in any way. You will not be asked for contributions. We assemble for Bible study and worship each Sunday morning and we welcome you to meet with us. We would be happy to talk to you about your questions and we want to be of encouragement.

If you have any comments or questions --- or would like the location and contact names of a congregation of the church belonging to Jesus Christ near you, please e-mail me at BibleTruths@hotmail.com or call 253-396-0290. Thanks Dennis Crawford, editor.

Read more!

Monday, November 12, 2007

STRUCTURED BIBLE STUDY METHODS

Using the Methods Taught By
Jesus Christ and His Apostles

Section 1 of 4 Parts

· Why Should We Study The Bible?

Study to show yourself approved unto God,
a worker who does not need to be ashamed,
rightly dividing the Word of truth
.”
2 Timothy 2:15


The verse quoted here in 2 Timothy 2:15 indicates that God expects His people to “study” His Word to rightly discern His Truths. It also indicates by necessary inference that there is a wrong way (an incorrect way) of discerning these Truths which can lead one to be “ashamed” on judgment day.

But the word of the LORD was unto them precept upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon line; here a little, and there a little; that they might go, and fall backward, and be broken, and snared, and taken.Isaiah 28:13


Here in Isaiah, God reveals through His Word, that one of the reasons that God has chosen the way He has to deliver the Bible is to cull out those who are lazy or who want to believe what they want. To paraphrase this verse, what God is saying is that He has chosen to give the Bible a little here and a little there so that it takes an effort to find everything that God has given on a subject. In simple plain English, God has set the Bible up in the way he has to filter out those who will not study to see what God wants them to do, in other words, God wants to weed out those who are too lazy to study.

Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God. Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual. But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.” 1 Corinthians 2:12-14

Scripture must be compared with all Scriptureon any given topic, in context, to discover God’s truths on that topic.

Some other verses that shed more light on this subject is: Matthew 7:21-23 when Jesus said,
Not every one who says to me, ‘Lord’ Lord’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. Many will say to Me in that day, ‘Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your Name, cast out demons in Your Name, and done many wonders in Your Name?’ And then I will declare unto them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!


We can see from these verses that MANY who actively call themselves “Christians” will not see heaven because of their lack of “rightly dividing” the Scriptures so that they can be obedient to them!


John 4:23-24 when Jesus spoke to the women at the well, “... the hour is coming, and now is, when the true worshippers will worship the Father in spirit and truth; for the Father is seeking such to worship Him. God is Spirit and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth.” And in John 17:17, “Sanctify them by Your truth. Your word is truth

2 Peter 1:20-21knowing this first, that no prophesy of Scripture is of any private interpretation, for prophesy never came by the will of man, but holy men of God spoke as they were moved by the Holy Spirit.” The words in the Bible have only the meaning God meant them to have, not the many “private interpretations” of the men of varying denominations and divisions of “Christianity.” It is the task of the one seeking God’s truth to “study to show himself approved unto God ... rightly dividing the word...” to discover what God is saying to us.

2 Peter 3:16, “... in which are some things hard to understand, which untaught and unstable people twist to their own destruction, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures.”

2 Thessalonians 2:10 speaks of "... those who perish, because they did not receive the love of the truth, that they might be saved."

THE AUTHORITY OF GOD
Authority Defined: "the right to command and enforce obedience."

All Authority Has One Source, God: He Has Natural Authority because He Is The Creator Of All Things.

BY WHAT AUTHORITY DID JESUS DO ALL?
    1. By the authority of creation, Jesus was involved in the creation,
    (Genesis 1:1; 18, 26; John 1:1, 14, 33; Mark 1:9-11).

    2. Jesus was delegated authority, by the Father; (Matt. 28:18).

    3. Jesus delegates authority to disciples,
    (Matthew 28:18-20; Luke 24:44-49; Acts 1:5, 8).

    4. By command - "makes disciples", ""teach them to observe all things I have commanded you", (Matthew 28:20).

    5.Do not add or subtract from Scripture" (Rev 22:18-19; Prov. 30:6; Dueteronomy 4:2; 12:32; Heb. 13:7)
    "The faith that was once and for all entrusted to the saints.” (Jude 3).
God's Authority Has Been Transmitted: From God The Father And God The Son, Jesus Christ, To The Disciples; From The Disciples, Through The Holy Spirit, To Us Through The Scriptures As Given By God To The Apostles.

· Always include humbly seeking God the Father by earnestly praying and asking Him to reveal His truths as you diligently study the Scriptures: Also ask Him to help you overcome any prejudices or biases that might cause a stumbling-block for you in understanding His will. “Ask, and it will be given to you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives, and he who seeks finds, and to him who knocks it will be opened. Or what man is there among you who, if his son asks for bread, will give him a stone? Or if he asks for a fish, will he give him a serpent? If you then, being evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father who is in heaven give good things to those who ask Him!” (Matthew 7:7-11; and Luke 11:9-13)

RULES ARE NECESSARY1
We have the Bible that is God's only Word to us. It is complete, without error or contradictions. But why are there so many different denominations , each one "interpreting" it's truths in a different way, when there can only be one truth about what God expects from us religiously and morally? This is the result of erratic Bible study methods, which makes the Bible the source of confusion rather than light.

Upon The Correct Interpretation Of The Bible Rests Our Very Salvation!
There also can only be "one truth" in the area of science and mathematics. One and one is always two; when certain chemicals are mixed together under certain defined conditions the result is always the same. The Bible itself says that there is “no private interpretation” of the Scriptures (2 Peter 1:20); God is no respector of persons (Acts 10:34), but has the same plan of salvation and worship for all men. When results are not consistent, then something is missing from the method or "defined conditions".

False Conclusions Caused by False Methods
During the dark ages Francis Bacon observed brilliant men arriving at opposite and absurd conclusions. He concluded that the reason for this was the methods (or lack of consistent methods) they were using. If truth is always consistent, then two equally intelligent men must arrive at the same conclusion or they are using a false method. Bacon attacked the methods then in use and became known as the "Father of inductive methods for discovering truth." Galileo and others perfected Bacon's method and today it is recognized by all fields of science as the correct method for determining truth. It has been proven a hundred million times in every field of science.

Francis Bacon (1561-1612) gave four reasons for not arriving at truth:

    1) “Wishful" thinking.
    2) Personal prejudice;
    3) Failure to define terms;
    4) The blind acceptance of traditions as authority
    .
Science deals with physical facts while we are dealing with spiritual facts. Scientists have to observe the physical facts and faithfully record them. Then after all the facts that can be obtained are recorded they follow certain rules to determine the truth about any subject. The only difference is that in this case the facts are already faithfully recorded in the scriptures for us. We do not need to worry about someone giving us the wrong facts. Thus, just as the scientist takes his facts he has gathered from observation, we take our facts revealed by God; he follows certain rules that keep him from error and we likewise can follow these rules to keep us from error, if faithfully applied. These “rules” have been laid down for us By Jesus Christ and the Apostles in the Bible, if we will but take the time to find them.

In the case of different interpretations of God's truth the "something missing" is the same thing that was missing back when Francis Bacon observed brilliant men coming to totally opposite and absurd conclusions about identical observations: the Methods they were using were totally inadequate to the task. The same is true in the Christian religious world. A common structured method of studying the Bible, in which everyone who is truly searching for truth, can come into the knowledge of God's truth. There is but “one truth” when it comes to God’s will, just as there is “one truth” in mathematics and science. Jesus and the Apostles gave us these principles in the Bible for us to follow. This is what we herein attempt to show.

Some rules are necessary or every one could include or exclude anything they desired. The honest person must be guided by the rules of logic or they can:

    1) Unconsciously they will put in something he desires;
    2) Prejudice will cause them to either insert an immaterial fact or to reject an essential fact;
    3) Ignorance will cause one to either insert or reject in the wrong manner.
Structured Bible Study Methods is a ”science”in that it can determine certain principles for discovering the meaning of a Biblical document, and in that these principles are not a mere list of rules but bears a natural relationship to each other. It is also an ”art” because rules can not be applied mechanically but involve skill which is acquired with use and the passion to know the truth of God's Word.

But before beginning --- some basic assumptions must be recognized, or no consistent agreement is possible with what God intends for us:
    1) The Bible (As Given To The Apostles and Christ’s anointed disciples) Is The Word Of God Almighty.

    "All scripture is given by the inspiration of God, and is useful for teaching, rebuking, and training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work
    ." (2 Timothy 3:16-17)

    "We thank God continually because, when you received the word of God, which you heard from us, you accepted it not as the word of men, but as it actually is, the word of God, which is at work in you who believe."(1 Thessalonians 2:13)

    Remember, since we do not have the original copies of the Bible books which were written by the inspired men of God; all the translations we have today are translated by men, who were not inspired by God. They all contain some errors, and it our responsibility to “study to show ourselves approved unto God” by ascertaining if the text we are studying agrees with the original text which were inspired by God. We have a wealth of manuscripts available to do this. Through comparisons of different versions and the original text we can ascertain the message as given by God to the writers of the Holy Scriptures!

    2) In The Word Of God Is Discovered The Truth.

    Jesus said in John 17:17, "Sanctify them by the truth; your word is truth."

    Paul said, "... since we have heard of your faith in Christ Jesus , and the love that you have for all saints, and the hope that is laid up for you in heaven, that you have already heard about in the word of truth of the gospel ..." (Colossians 1:3-5)

    3) The Truth as Revealed In God's Word Constitutes The Will Of God For Man.

    The Jews were amazed about Jesus' teachings and asked, “How did this man get such learning, without having studied?” Jesus answered them and said, “My teaching are not my own, it comes from Him who sent me. If anyone chooses to do God's will, he will find out whether My teachings comes from God or whether I speak on My own.” (John 7:15-17)

    Ananias told Paul that, "The God of our fathers has chosen you to know His will and to see the righteous One, and to hear the words from His mouth. you will be His witness to all men of what you have seen and heard." (Acts 22:12-15)

    4) God's Will Is Written Down In Human Language, In It’s Final Form, So That Men May Know The Truth.

    Paul told the Ephesians 3:4-6, “Surely you have heard of the administration of the of God’s grace that was given to me to for you, that is the mystery made known to me by revelation, as I have already written briefly. in reading this then, you will be able to understand my insight into the mystery of Christ, which was not made known to men in other generations as it has now been revealed by the spirit to God’s holy apostles and prophets. This mystery is that through the gospel the gentiles are heirs, together with Israel, members together of one body, and sharers together in the promise in Christ Jesus.” He concluded His argument in 1 Corinthians 4:6, “... so that you may learn from us the meaning of the saying, “Do not go beyond what is written.”

    · We Are Told Not To Add To, Or To Take Away From What Is Written In The Bible. (Revelations 22:18-19; Dueteronomy. 4:2; 12:32)

    Jesus said, "If you hold to My teachings, you are really My disciples, then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free." (See John 8:31-36)

    5) God Intends For Men To Be Able To Understand What His Will For Them Requires.
    In His discussion of the distruction of Jerusalem, Jesus quoted a passage from the old testament in said, “ ... let the reader understand..."(Matthew 24:15). In explaining the parable of the sower He said, “he that receives seed unto the good ground is he that hears the Word and understands it, which also bears fruit, and brings forth some a hundred fold, some sixty, and some thirty,” (Matthew 13:23).

    Paul writes to those at Corinth and Ephesians,
    "For we do not write you anything you cannot read and understand..."(2 Corinthians 1:13)
    "Do not be foolish, but understand what the will of the Lord is." (Ephesians 5:17)

    Some of God's word is easy to understand and some is hard to understand.
    (1 Corinthians 3:2; Hebrews 6:1-2; 2 Peter 3:16-18)

    This process of understanding what the will of the Lord is called interpretation of Scripture, or Hermeneutics. In the Old Testament Ezra defined it this way: "So they read from the book of the law of God, making it clear and giving the meaning so that the people could understand what was being read." (Nehemiah 8:8)

    Paul was given the words of the scripture by the Holy Spirit, "So that we may understand..."by "comparing spiritual things with spiritual," (1 Corinthians 2:9-13)

    6) God Expects Men To Discern And Obey His Will.

    "In the past God overlooked such ignorance, but now He commands all people everywhere to repent." (Acts 17:30-31)

    The Bible says that only those who diligiently seek God’s truth will go to heaven:

    Matthew 7:13-15; “Enter by the narrow gate; for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and there are many who go in by it. Because narrow is the gate and difficult is the way which leads to life, and there are few who find it. Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves.” NKJV

    Matthew 7:21-23; “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. Many will say to Me in that day, ‘Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?’ And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!’ ” NKJV


    Jesus Himself said in a series of verses from John, "If you love me you will keep My commandments", "Whoever has My commandments and obeys them, he is the one who loves Me", "If anyone loves me, he will obey My teachings”, "He who does not love me will not keep my commandments."; “You are my friends if you do whatsoever I command you.” (John 14:15, 21, 23, 24)

    Paul told the Philippians, "Wherefore my beloved, as you have obeyed not only in my presence, but also in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling for it is God that works in you to both to will and to do His good pleasure"; "...take note of those who live according to the pattern we gave you."; "Whatever you have learned or received or heard from me, or seen in me - put it into practice." (Philippians 2:12; 3:17; 4:6-9)

    These passages serve as but a sampling of the verses contained in the Word of God on the subject, and could be found multiplied many times over! They call to note what cannot possible be over-emphasized:

    God's Word Must Be Received In Faithful Obedience If We Would Escape The Eternal Fires Of Hell To Enjoy The Raptures Of Heaven On The Day Of Judgment!

    We must never lose sight of the fact that God's Word is intended by God to be the standard by which we base all our actions. God's Word is full of verbs like: will, obey, do, keep, charge, teach, instruct. Likewise it is full of nouns like: commandments, instruction, duty, rule, and pattern are more than plentiful. Whatever system of interpretation that we adopt it must not argue away these fundamental and self-evident truths!


Having established these boundaries, let us see what we can learn about the application of our traditional hermeneutics. Interpretation of scripture requires far more than simply ferreting out a list of obligatory commands, example, or necessary inferences. The Word of God is much more than simply a collection of loosely-nit statements demanding compliance. In it's entirety, and particularity in the New Testament, the scriptures constitute the complete revelation of God's will. This system of God's Grace according to which obedient believers can be saved eternally.

The process of interpretation begins in it's remotest reaches with Biblical Introduction, which is devoted to the Historical Critical Examination of the different books of the Bible. It inquires after their age, authorship, genuineness, canonical authority. At the same time tracing their origin, preservation, integrity; exhibiting their contents, relative rank, and general character in value. It proceeds on to the Textural Criticism, which has it's object of ascertaining of exact words of the original text by the collation and comparison of ancient manuscripts, versions, and scripture quotations.

After the demands of criticism have been satisfied, hermeneutics properly begins. The aim is to establish the methods, principles, and rules that are needful to unfold the sense of what is written. The application of these principles and rules is called exegesis, which describes the process of taking out of the text the meaning that is resident in the words of that text.

In order to arrive at the understanding God intends that we receive from His Word one must of coarse observe carefully the historical context in which the passage is written. We must be entirely sensitive to the written context.

In addition one must recognize the attendant characteristics of the kind of literature being studied. There are ten different kinds of literature found in the Scriptures: The Epistles, the Old Testament Narratives, the Acts, the Gospels, the Parables, the Law, the Psalms, the Wisdom, and the Revelation. We must not limit God or His Word. We must not over-emphasize our studies in one area of the Bible to the exclusion of other areas

The Entire Bible Is Necessary For A Proper Understanding Of The Entire Will Of God On A Matter.(2 Peter 3:16; Romans 15:4; 1 Corinthians 2:13; 10:11)

From these considerations and works there is obviously much more to correct interpretation of God’s Word than is encompassed by our principle of Command, Example, and Necessary Inference.

However, the establishment of Bible Authority for a practice binding either upon or the collective body of Christians today is another question altogether. In order to establish Bible Authority for a practice one must produce a Command, Example, or Necessary Inference. Such an obligatory instruction must be established in accord with the principles and rules of Hermeneutics. When any of these three; Command, Example, or Necessary Inference is properly advanced, then it constitutes the Authoritative Will of God.

We know that this method of establishing New Testament Authority is the correct one because it was precisely this line of argumentation used by Jesus and the Apostles in the Word of God. The reason these points are valid is because Jesus and the Apostles made them valid.

Does this make other methods wrong or dangerous to one's salvation? The question turns on what is considered as "other methods" Any method of Bible Interpretation which seeks to escape the Authority of God's Word or to lessen it's requirements on man is wrong and extremely dangerous, and will cause someone to lose their soul!

The Divine PatternHold the PATTERN of sound words which thou hast heard from me, in faith and love which is in Christ Jesus” (2 Timothy 1:13 ASV)

A Pattern may be defined as a detailed set of instructions for the construction and operation of a particular thing. There are hundreds of examples which could be listed. A blueprint for a house is a pattern. A set of plans for a model air plane is a pattern. Many companies sell clothing patterns consisting of paper overlays which are used as a guide for cutting out cloth so that a garment can be made.

The Apostle Paul makes it very clear that his preaching and teaching formed a Pattern. What sort of pattern? A Divine Pattern revealed by inspiration to be used as the one and only guide for (1) The procedure for becoming a Christian, (2) worship in spirit and in truth, and (3) Living a righteous life. Paul commands Christians to follow this Divine Pattern. This is not optional.

The Pattern Principle
A pattern is a simple, yet powerful instrument:
    (1) By following a pattern, an object can be made to a certain size, shape color, and composition.
    (2) A single pattern can be used to build any number of identical objects.
    (3) A pattern will also allow any amount of time between construction of these identical objects. For example, the famous ship, the Titanic, which was completed in 1912 was obviously built from a set of plans or blueprints. If someone so desired, an identical ship could be built, 100 years later, by following the same plans.
    (4) A pattern can only be changed in two ways: addition and subtraction. If a pattern never has anything added to it and never has anything subtracted from it, it will remain unchanged. Under these conditions, change is impossible.
Two Sources Of Information
It is an indisputable fact that one source of information found in a pattern is “what it says”. What the pattern says may be thought of as the VOICE of the pattern. All patterns give the required information for the construction of the object they portray. This information tells the builder, dressmaker, tailor, or hobbyist what materials he should use, what size to make the object, what the geometry of the object should be, etc. In many cases, the pattern will also specify the sequence of events. For example, when a hobbyist assembles a model airplane, he may be told to put the pilot in before gluing down the canopy. If he ignores this message, he will have made a serious error.

It may be said then, that the voice of the pattern tells one what to do. In every case there are few, if any, warnings against doing things incorrectly, using incorrect materials, or failing to do what is specified. A universal rule which is understood and accepted around the world is that patterns tell one what to do, thereby eliminating the need or long lists of forbidden deviations. Theoretically, there is an infinite number of ways to modify anything, whether it be a hotel building or a model airplane. There are countless ways the structure of a building can be changed such that it will collapse and innumerable ways to construct an airplane such that it will fail to fly. No designer can anticipate all these possibilities and, even if he could, it would take tons of paper to list them all. Certainly no one could afford to pay for such a list and no one could in a Lifetime read such a list.

The Only Practical Solution:
A Second Source Of Information
As has already been noted, the only practical solution is to allow the pattern to dictate what is to be done, and everything else must be understood to be excluded or forbidden. A simple illustration is the construction of an office building. If the blueprint specifies 10 stories, it cannot be 6 and it cannot be 16. This is true even if the architect has not placed a notice on the pattern, saying, “This building must not be built with either 6 or 16 floors, only 10".

It can be said, then, that a second source of information found in a blueprint is its silence; because, in effect, the silence tells one what not to do. The silence of the pattern actually contains a larger quantity of information than the voice of the pattern. The silence of a pattern is equal to a large library of books, while in many cases the voice of the pattern is a relatively small document.

An Illustration Of The Pattern of Silence
This concept is very readily understood in the physical world. For example, suppose a builder erects a 15 story building which then collapses. Suppose the government and authorities investigating the disaster discover that the blueprint for the building specified 10 stories, not 15. Obviously, the builder would face both civil and criminal charges. If the collapse of the building had killed someone, he would face a prison term for manslaughter. In his trial, the builder could not successfully argue that since the blueprint did not contain a notice forbidding the addition of 5 stories to the structure, he was at liberty to add 5 stories. The court would not absolve the builder of his guilt because the architect did not include a statement saying, “Thou shalt not add 5 stories to this building”; since the principle of Pattern silence is recognized by civil law.

The Lord’s Pattern
The Divine Patterns given during the Patriarchal and Mosaic Ages are important because they demonstrate and illustrate the Pattern Principle, and because they serve as a foundation or understanding the Pattern for the Church.

For example, in the Patriarchal age God gave Noah a Pattern for the construction of the Ark, a huge boat. The Pattern specified the dimensions, the number of stories, the number of windows and doors, and the construction materials. The Pattern specified that the Ark was to be made of “gopher wood”. It was unnecessary for the Lord to specifically forbid every other material in the world. He did not need to say, “Don’t use pine”, “Don’t use oak”, “Don’t use iron”, etc. It was quite enough to simply say, “Make thee an ark of gopher wood” (Genesis 6:14). This example is a substantial illustration of the voice and silence of the Pattern Principle.

In the Mosaic age, God expected the Israelites to follow His Pattern. One especially clear statement of this fact is found in Hebrews 8:5, “Moses is warned of God when he is about to make the tabernacle: for, See, saith he, that thou make all things according to the pattern that was showed thee in the mount”(ASV). This verse contains a number of important facts. First, it is indisputable that Moses was given a Pattern by the Lord. Second, Moses was to follow the Pattern in all things not just in some things. In other words, he had to follow it when making the major tabernacle components and also when making the less important ones. Third, it was so critical that Moses follow this Pattern that God spoke to him as he was about to construct the Tabernacle and reminded him to follow it. This reminder was not in the form of a suggestion or a meek request. On the contrary, the Lord commanded Moses to follow the Pattern in all things.

A careful study of Hebrews 8:1-5 reveals that Paul’s purpose in discussing the Mosaic Pattern was to demonstrate that Christians are to follow the New Testament Pattern just as Moses was required to follow the Pattern for the Tabernacle.

Paul commands Christians to “Hold the pattern of sound words which thou hast heard from me, in faith and love which is in Christ Jesus” (2 Timothy 1:13). Contained within the New Testament Scriptures is the Christian Pattern. Christians are obligated to “hold” the Pattern, which means they are to follow its guidance in serving the Father through Jesus Christ. Christians are under no less charge than was Moses with respect to the sacred pattern. Christ’s Pattern is to be strictly followed in “all things”.

Romans 6:17 says, “But thanks be to God, that, whereas ye were servants of sin, ye became obedient from the heart to that form of teaching whereunto ye were delivered” (ASV). As indicated by the translators in the footnotes, the word “form” can also be translated “pattern”. The Greek word is tupos, which is the word used in Hebrews 8:5. The Roman Christians obeyed the New Testament Pattern delivered to them through the preaching of inspired men such as Paul. This verse explicitly dictates that the relationship of the Christian to the Pattern is to be one of obedience. Hebrews 8:5 indicates that it is to be complete obedience, not partial obedience.

Do Not Go Beyond What Is Written
Now these things, brethren, I have in a figure transferred to myself and Apollos for your sakes; that in us you might learn not to go beyond the things which are written.” (I Corinthians 4:6 ASV).

The meaning of this passage is well expressed by A.R. Fausset, “Revere the silence of holy writ as much as its declarations.” As Mr. Fausset observed, this verse confirms the principle of Silence. Not only are Christians to obey what is written but they are also to refrain from regarding the Lord’s Silence as a license to follow human ideas. In short, both the Lord’s Word and Silence are to be obeyed. Those who may be led to believe that the principle of “Authoritative Silence” is a new idea are reminded that Mr. Fausset’s comments were first published in 1869.

If silence rules against a practice, then to engage in such a practice is to add to the word of God! We must not only speak where the Bible speaks, but we must be silent when the Bible is silent. 2 John 9; John 8:31; Hebrews 7:12-14; Leviticus 10:1-3; 1 Corinthians 4:6; Acts 17:11.

If it is true that the scripture is truly silent about a matter, then the silence of the scriptures forbids it.

CONTEXT IS EVERYTHING!
PROPER INTERPRETATION always involves studying the authors PURPOSE and observing the contextual considerations. If it be established that one must follow this pattern, or that this is the pattern to be followed in each case of affliction, happiness, or sickness, that in no way impinges on the necessity of Christians to obey God's Word in other areas! It would simply constitute one more obligation to be met, and a possible inconsistency in our own actions that needs to be corrected. It would not lessen out responsibilities to worship according to the New Testament pattern one iota.

When we study a passage of Scripture we must define the context, which is very important in understanding what God is saying to us in the Bible: “Who is speaking?” “To whom are they speaking?” “When was it spoken?” “Where was it spoken?” “and “What is the purpose?” In other words in relation to the words around it; the sentences, verses, chapters, and books before and after it. The Bible must be taken as a "whole" to be understood properly, otherwise confusion results. Psalms 119:160 (N.A.S.) says, "The Sum Of Your Word Is Truth". GOD'S WORD CONTAINS NO CONTRADICT-IONS! Any apparent contradiction is in our understanding and/or lack of enough study on the matter under consideration. God is not the author of confusion ---(1 Corinthians 14:33).

TAKE NOTES: A notebook is a valuable aid to Bible study because we tend to remember what we write down (or at least we can find it). If we forget a notebook helps us to remember.

Also, look up all references with parallel thoughts, through the use of a complete concordance of the Bible. These list every word in the particular version of the Bible you may have and their locations in the Bible, as well as giving their Greek or Hebrew meanings. (Strong’s Complete Concordances, Nave’s Topical Bible, and Trench Synonyms are good but not exclusive choices). Much of this will come from your experience of reading the Bible though many times. Try and get in the habit of reading the Bible through each year to gain an overall understanding of God’s Word. All of the Bible is His Word, and is necessary for our understanding of His will. (Psalms 119:160).

Define word meanings (An Expository Dictionary of Old and New testament Words is very valuable here), things alike and unlike, and write down main thoughts, and central characters. It is helpful to read a passage in various translations, making careful comparisons.

CONSIDER ALL VERSES RELATED TO THAT TOPIC
Read every verse on a given subject (understanding the context --- of course). Beware of one verse answers. Study the customs and history of the times related to the subject you are studying. For instance, the question, “What is involved in the Lord’s Supper, so that I may be sure I am doing it correctly?” should not be answered with one or two verses. The Old Testament (and is for our “learning” also, Romans 15:4) has much to say to help us understand what God is saying in the New Testament. During the Jewish Passover, when the Lord’s Supper was instituted by Jesus is illustrated in Exodus 12:3-28, 43-49; 13:6-9, and gives much insight into the requirements then in effect, which necessarily carried over for the Lord’s Supper. (i.e. leavening, the “one lamb per household” which represented Jesus body as does the loaf, etc.)

Other New Testament verse further clarify what is required, by asking some questions: “What did Jesus say and do?” “What did the Apostles do?” “Which of these things have spiritual significance today?1 Corinthians 10:16-17; 11:24-31; Luke 22:19-20; Matthew 26:17, 26-30; Mark 14:16-26 --- and any other Scriptures that have spiritual significance...

Look for approved (be God) Commands, Examples, or Necessary Inferences (It can be taken no other way logically = “necessary” inference).

Figures of speech should be carefully studied and be understood fully. The meanings must be taken as literal unless the context forces us to take it as figurative, just as we do in daily communication. Word study books give helpful information and a Bible atlas is useful..

Biblical References To Command, Example
And Necessary Inference
Let's examine the three methods of establishing the validity of out Christian practices. Although Examples occur so often that substantiation seems hardly necessary, a few illustrations in respect to:

COMMANDS:
Jesus said, "These things I command you, that you love one another." (John 15:17)

Paul instructed Timothy, "These things command and teach." (1 Timothy 4:11)
EXAMPLES:
Jesus Himself exemplified the observance of the Lord's supper for us on the night He was betrayed. (Matthew 26:26-29; Mark 14:22-24; Luke 22:14-20; 1 Corinthians 11:23-29)

Peter said, "To this you were called, because Christ suffered for you, leaving you an example, that you should follow in His steps." (1 Peter 2:21)

Paul, referring to God's Judgment against idolatrous Israelites, warned us that "all these things happened unto them for examples."` (1 Corinthians 10:6)

NECESSARY INFERENCES:
As for Necessary Inferences: In His reply to the Sadducees trick question concerning the Levite law, Jesus Necessarily Inferred that Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob were still living somewhere, even though there physical deaths had occurred centuries before. (Matthew 22:22-32)

In Acts 15:12, Luke Necessarily implies that the miracles and wonders wrought by Paul and Barnabus among the Gentiles proved that God had accepted the Gentiles as proper candidates for conversion upon the same basis that He did the Jews. In other words, without being made to keep the Law of Moses, or any of its provisions.

In 1 Corinthians 11:26, Paul necessarily implies the use of one cup in the observance of the Lord's Supper by using the figure of speech called metonymy in the phrase "drink this cup".

Finally, in Hebrew 7:14, the writer necessarily implies that Jesus could not be a priest on earth because it is evident our Lord sprang out of Judah, about which tribe Moses spoke nothing about the priesthood."

The point of these illustrations is that We Establish Bible Authority By Command, Example, And Necessary Inference Not Because Anyone Else Does Or Does Not Do It This Way, But Because That Is Exactly How Jesus And The Apostles Applied Their Lines Of Argumentation In The Record Of The New Testament!

WORSHIP IN SPIRIT AND TRUTH
In John 4:24 Jesus said, “God is a spirit: and they that worship Him must worship Him in spirit and in truth”. The word “must” shows that truthful worship is imperative; it is not optional. There is only one way a person can worship in truth and that is by following the Pattern in “all things”. Those who change, modify, or circumvent the Pattern cannot worship in truth. The Lord has promised to reward the faithful and punish those who refuse to obey the truth of the Gospel (2 Thessalonians 1:8).

The expression “obey the gospel” is not restricted to an acceptance of the Plan of Salvation, the Five Steps into Christ: [Hear the Gospel (Romans 10:17), Believe (Mark 1:15)), Repent (Luke 13:3-5), Baptism for forgiveness of Sins (Acts 2:38; 8:38; 22:16; Romans 6:3-5), Continue steadfast in Christ until death (Revelation 2:10)], but incorporates the entirety of the harmony of New Testament Christianity:

    (1) the procedure for becoming a Christian
    (2) the scriptural work and worship of the Church and
    (3) the living of a righteous and holy life
The Pattern is composed of all the elements of the Gospel; thus, obeying the Pattern carries the promise of eternal life, while disobeying the Pattern, in whole or in part, carries the penalty of eternal doom.

End of Part one.
Part two: “Command, Example, and Necessary Inference
Part Three: “When is an Example Binding?” by George Battey
Part Four: “How Implication Binds and Silence Forbids” by Alan Bonify.

Compiled and Edited by P. Dennis Crawford

References

1. Jim Putterbaugh, Camino, CA, 1993
2. Don Pruit, Manteca, CA, New Years Meeting 1997
3. Glen Osburn, Placerville, CA, 1995
4. Greg DeGolf, Labor Day Meeting 1997

WHAT CAN YOU DO?
You can accept the authority of Christ by doing what He commanded (Matthew 7:21; John 14:15; 15:10-14; Luke 6:46). Notice the pattern for becoming a Christian as revealed in the Scriptures. The Gospel was heard, resulting in faith (Romans 10:17). Repentance of (turning away from) sin (Acts 17:30) and confession of Jesus as the Son of God followed (Romans 10:10). Believers were baptized INTO Christ for the remission (forgiveness) of sins (See Galatians 3:27; Colossians 2:12; Acts 2:38; 22:16; Mark 16:16; Romans 6:3-5; 1 Peter 3:20-21), and added to His church (Acts 2:47). Christians were taught to be faithful even to the point of death (Revelation 2:10).

WE WELCOME YOU
Following the instructions of the Scriptures, members of Christ’s body assemble as congregations for worship, encouragement, and Bible study. The congregation in your community welcomes you to investigate the Bible with us. With a spirit of brotherly love we would seek to reconcile any differences by following the Bible ONLY. We recognize the Bible as God’s inspired word, the ONLY reliable standard of faith and practice. We desire the unity for which Christ prayed and which the Bible emphasizes in the expression, “one Lord, one faith, one baptism.” Together we seek to maintain “the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.”

A friendly welcome awaits you. We do not wish to embarrass you in any way. You will not be asked for contributions. We assemble for Bible study and worship each Sunday morning and we welcome you to meet with us. We would be happy to talk to you about your questions and we want to be of encouragement. Please e-mail me, Dennis Crawford, at BibleTruths@hotmail.com for comments or further Bible information, or for the location of a congregation belonging to Jesus Christ near you.

Read more!

Thursday, November 8, 2007

ARE WE STILL UNDER THE TEN COMMANDMENTS?

COVENANT WITH ISRAEL
A covenant is an agreement. God made an agreement with the descendants of Jacob. The Law given through Moses, including the Ten Commandments, is the written record of that agreement. “The LORD our God made a covenant with us at Horeb. The LORD did not make this covenant with our fathers, but with us, those who are here today, all of us who are alive.” (Dueteronomy 5:2-3). The “us” in the passage is the Israelites. The Law was given only to the Israelites. We are not under the Law and it’s commandments today because it was a covenant between the Israelites and God.

TEMPORARY
This covenant was temporary in nature. God revealed through the prophet Jeremiah, “... I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel ...” (Jeremiah 31:31). The apostle Paul explained that the Law of Moses was intended as a teacher to bring those under the Law to Christ. But after Christ came, those under the Law were no longer under it. “Therefore the law was our tutor to bring us to Christ, that we might be justified by faith. But after faith has come, we are no longer under a tutor.” (Galatians 3:24-25).

FOLLOW CHRIST
One can not follow the Law of Moses and at the same time follow Christ. “For Christ is the end of the law of righteousness to everyone who believes” (Romans 10:6).

A BETTER COVENANT
Christ is the Mediator of a new and better covenant. “... He is also Mediator of a better covenant, which has been established on better promises. For if that first covenant had been faultless, then no place would have been sought for a second” (Hebrews 8:6-7). Two covenants cannot be in effect at the same time. See Hebrews 9:15-10:4.

PRIESTHOOD OF CHRIST
Christ is High Priest and all Christians are priests under the new covenant (Hebrews 4:4; 1 Peter 2:9). If the first covenant were still in effect Christ could not be a high priest and Christians could not be priests. See Hebrews 7:11-19.

LAW FULFILLED
The Law was fulfilled in Christ. He said, “Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill” (Matthew 5:17).

LAW REMOVED
Jesus fulfilled the Law and provided for forgiveness of sins through His own sacrifice. In so doing He removed the Law. “... having wiped out the handwriting of requirements that was against us, which was contrary to us. And He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross” (Colossians 2:14).

COVENANTS CONTRASTED
The apostles of Jesus were ministers of a new covenant. The former passed away; the new covenant remains and is more glorious (2 Corinthians 3:5-11).

WHAT PRINCIPLES?
Since we are not under the Ten Commandments, someone may ask, “Is it all right to kill, to steal, to commit adultery, or to do the other things which the Ten Commandments prohibit?” No! Those things are forbidden in the New Testament also. The apostle Peter wrote of the knowledge God revealed in Christ,
“... His divine power has given to us all things that pertain to life and godliness ...” (2 Peter 1:3).

WHY STUDY THE LAW?
The Law reveals much about the nature of God, the importance of obedience, the certainty of punishment for disobedience, and the importance of faith. These and other lessons are learned from a study of the Old Testament. “For whatever things were written before were written for our learning, that we through the patience and comfort of the Scriptures might have hope” (Romans 15:4).

HANDLE CORRECTLY
If we are to correctly apply the Scriptures, we must handle them correctly. It is incorrect to lift out the parts we want and overlook other parts. This is the practice of those who lift the Ten Commandments from the Old Testament and apply them for today. For example, the commandments require Sabbath observance. The Sabbath is the seventh day --- Saturday. Some have sought to make an adjustment by use of the phrase “Christian Sabbath.” But the Scriptures do not speak of a “Christian Sabbath.” Christians assembled for worship on the Lord’s Day --- Sunday. See Acts 20:7and 1 Corinthians 16:2. As Christians, we should follow the pattern found in the New Testament.

SALVATION IN CHRIST
The Israelites did not receive forgiveness for sins under the Law. See Hebrews 10:4. A remembrance of sins was made once each year. But under the new covenant there is forgiveness as Jeremiah prophesied, “... I will forgive their inequity, and their sin I will remember no more” (Jeremiah 31:34).

JESUS IS LORD
To accept Jesus as Lord is to submit to His authority. If we lift portions of the Law and apply them today, we do not accept Jesus as Lord. If we accept Him as Lord and Savior, we will accept His authority as expressed in these words, “... All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the world” (Matthew 28:18-20).

WHAT CAN YOU DO?
You can accept the authority of Christ by doing what He commanded (Matthew 7:21; John 14:15; 15:10-14; Luke 6:46). Notice the pattern for becoming a Christian as revealed in the Scriptures. The Gospel was heard, resulting in faith (Romans 10:17). Repentance of (turning away from) sin (Acts 17:30) and confession of Jesus as the Son of God followed (Romans 10:10). Believers were baptized INTO Christ for the remission (forgiveness) of sins (See Galatians 3:27; Colossians 2:12; Acts 2:38; 22:16; Mark 16:16; Romans 6:3-5; 1 Peter 3:20-21), and added to His church (Acts 2:47). Christians were taught to be faithful even to the point of death (Revelation 2:10).

WE WELCOME YOU
Following the instructions of the Scriptures, members of Christ’s body assemble as congregations for worship, encouragement, and Bible study. The congregation in your community welcomes you to investigate the Bible with us. With a spirit of brotherly love we would seek to reconcile any differences by following the Bible ONLY. We recognize the Bible as God’s inspired word, the ONLY reliable standard of faith and practice. We desire the unity for which Christ prayed and which the Bible emphasizes in the expression, “one Lord, one faith, one baptism.” Together we seek to maintain “the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.”

A friendly welcome awaits you. We do not wish to embarrass you in any way. You will not be asked for contributions. We assemble for Bible study and worship each Sunday morning and we welcome you to meet with us. We would be happy to talk to you about your questions and we want to be of encouragement.

Please e-mail me, Dennis Crawford, at BibleTruths@hotmail.com for comments or further Bible information, or for the location of a congregation belonging to Jesus Christ near you.

Read more!

Wednesday, November 7, 2007

HOW IMPLICATION BINDS & SILENCE FORBIDS

Alan Bonifay
Christian’s Expositor Journal Spring 2007


The Bible Teaches by Implication: Defining the Terms
It is popular in some circles to deny that the Bible teaches by implication. This view suggests that implications are the product of human reasoning, and therefore cannot be considered as equivalent to, or part of God’s Word. In other words, this view says that only those things which the Bible explicitly teaches can be rightly bound on people. Technically speaking, we may call this doctrine the “explicit-only” doctrine or the “bind-no-implication” doctrine.

Even though the “explicit only” doctrine is wrong, it is surprising how deep its inroads have become --- especially when it comes to the prohibitive nature of Bible silence. Before we look at this idea in depth, however, let us define some terms by using an outline format. We encourage the reader to follow this outline and look up the various Scriptures cited.

EXPLICIT: This is a statement or teaching of the Bible in which the very words of the Bible are used. The dictionary defines the term as something which is clearly stated: nothing is implied. In other words, it is something that is distinctly expressed and is definite. Example: 1 Timothy 2:3-4 explicitly (clearly) teaches that “God ... desires all men to be saved.”

IMPLICIT: This is a truth or teaching of the Bible that is not directly stated, but which is implied. It is a truth that the reader can correctly deduce from the words that are in the Bible. Another way of putting it is that the Bible’s implicit teachings are those statements that must also be true due to the truth of the Bible’s explicit teachings. The dictionary defines the term as something that is suggested or understood though not plainly expressed. It is something that is necessarily or naturally involved though not plainly apparent. A more technical definition is statement A implies statement B when it is impossible for statement A to be true and for statement B to be false. In other words, one statement (or a combination of statements) implies a second statement when the truthfulness of the first guarantees the truthfulness of the second. Note the following example:

Statement #1: John 3:16 reads, in part: “For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son ...”
Statement #2: “God so loved you that He gave His only begotten Son.

It is impossible for the first statement to be true and the second statement to be false. If God loved the world then God also loved you because you are a part of the “world.” Statement #1 guarantees statement #2. The explicit statement of John 3:16 implies God gave His only begotten Son for you. Because #1 is true, we can know absolutely that both statements are true.

Concerning these ideas, however, there are certain sounds being voiced (and maybe even among us). In the Firm Foundation as long ago as July 22, 1975, F. L Lemley wrote, “Since all inferences are of human origin, unless we want to hold on to human patterns we should discard necessary inference as poor pattern material.” In the same paper nearly a year earlier (Sept. 17, 1974) he said, “Any time a process of human reasoning has to intervene between the word and a conclusion, the conclusion is human and not divine, and therefore cannot be (even when true) a part of the New Testament pattern.” Furthermore, in his 1975 article F. L Lemley wrote, “Only those examples that are the objects of direct command are binding on us.

Similar quotations can be read from many writers in the church of Christ --- all of whom teach the false “explicit-only” doctrine. The Bible teachings us both explicitly and implicitly, and both forms of the Bible’s teachings are equally authoritative and binding. To the end, let us now note the binding nature of implicit teaching.

Implicit Teaching is Binding Because of its Authority.
God has given to Christ absolute authority in heaven and earth. “And Jesus came and spoke to them, saying, ‘All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth.’" (Matthew 28:18; see also Hebrews 1:1-2, Acts 3:22, & Ephesians 1:22-23).

Jesus delegated binding and loosing authority only to His apostles. “And I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and to whatever you bind on earth will be bound [literally “will be bound” = shall occur having already been bound] in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed [literally “will be loosed” = shall occur having already been bound] in heaven.” (Matthew 16:19; see also Matthew 18:18; John 13:20; 20:22-23; 1 John 4:6).

The authority of Christ is exercised by the apostles and other inspired men completely in the New Testament Scriptures. “All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work” (2 Timothy 3:16-17; see also 2 Peter 1:3; Jude 3; Galatians 1:6-8; 2 John 9-11; 1 Corinthians 14:37).

Because of the authority of Christ and the apostles, if we can prove that they taught by implication in the New Testament Scriptures, then we will have proven the binding character of implicit teaching fairly offer proof from the explicit words of Scripture.

Examples of Implicit Teachings
Jesus Taught Implicitly. In Matthew 22:23-32 Jesus taught by implication all of the following: the resurrection from the dead; that there is a life beyond this world; that the spirits of men survive their spiritual death. Jesus taught by implication that the Messiah was to be both and equally human and divine in Matthew 22:41-45. In Luke 7:19-23, Jesus taught John and his two disciples that He (Jesus) was, in fact, the coming One and that they did not need to look for another; He taught it implicitly (Matthew 11:2-6). Jesus also implicitly taught that men should render themselves unto God because they belonged to God (Matthew 22:15-22). Finally, Jesus implied that all laws from God hang upon two principles --- love God and love your fellow man (Matthew 22:34-40).

The Apostles And Other Inspired Men Taught Implicitly. Luke records that Phillip began at the same Scripture (Isaiah 53) and preached Jesus unto the Ethiopian nobleman. This preaching of Jesus included the necessity of baptism in order to be saved because it occasioned the eunuch’s question. “See here is water. What hinders me from being baptized?” (Acts 8:35-38). In 1 Corinthians 2:2 Paul declared that he determined to know nothing among the Corinthians but Christ and him crucified. Implicitly this means that, at a minimum, all that Paul writes to the Corinthians in both of his letters to them is covered in his determination to preach nothing save Jesus Christ and Him crucified. Hebrews 1:1-2, in combination with John 14:26 and 16:7-15, implies that everything the apostles and other inspired men taught is the teaching of Jesus.

The Scriptures Teach Implicitly. 1 Corinthians 11:26, Acts 20:7, and 1 Corinthians 16:2 teach that the Lord’s Supper must be observed weekly. Matthew 26:17, 26 teaches implicitly that the Lord’s Supper must be observed with unleavened bread. Matthew 26:17, 27-29 teaches that the Lord’s Supper must be observed with grape juice and not with fermented wine. First Corinthians 11:27 teaches the Lord’s Supper must be observed with one cup, for it is implicit in the statement, “Drink this cup,” since the word “cup” is used metonymically. 1 Corinthians 14:23, 26, 31, 34-37, & 40 --- these passages teach the class system of teaching is sinful. Galatians 5:19-21 implicitly teaches child pornography is wrong and sinful (including “such like”). Galatians 5:19-21, Ephesians 4:28, 1 Timothy 6:9-11, Matthew 7:12 --- these verses implicitly condemn gambling in all forms.

How can the reader of God’s Word correctly determine legitimate implicit teachings of Scripture?
For Scripture to teach something implicitly, it must meet the following seven conditions:
    1. Have a background passage or combination of passages which require(s) the reader to make a necessary inference because of the implicit teaching of God’s Word. For example, “Drink the cup” (1 Corinthians 11:27) requires the reader to understand that the word “cup,” the container, is being named to suggest its contents, and that only as many containers are involved as are named --- one. This is the figure of speech called “metonymy of the subject.” Another example: The reader is required to understand that the preaching of Jesus includes the necessity of baptism for salvation because of the eunuch’s question in Acts 8:36: “What hinders me from being baptized?” There is no other way to account for such a question in the in the context.

    2. Test of Apostolic Approval--- it cannot be an action or a teaching that is disapproved of elsewhere in God’s Word.

    3. Test of Unity --- it must harmonize with all other Bible passages. Note: In the previous requirement there must be apostolic approval without any rebuke. Here the point is that there must be no contradiction of any other Scripture.

    4. Law of Universal Application --- it must be within the realm of possibility for all people in all parts of the world and for all time to practice.

    5. Law of Essentiality --- it must be essential in performing the command that is in the background. Example: The statement in 1 Corinthians 11:26Drink this cup” is a metonymical reference to the fruit of the vine which is in the cup and is to be consumed, but the figure itself requires the presence of a cup and only one. However the size and shape of the container are not essential parts of the statement.

    6. Test of Competence --- it must be competent to support the conclusion drawn. “ ... he and all his family were baptized” (Acts 16:33). It is often alleged that the passage implicitly teaches infant baptism. However, that is not true because the passage is not competent to support such an idea. Many families do not include infants.

    7. Law of Limited Application --- it can be applied only to the circumstances to which the Holy Spirit applied it originally. Example: A Scripture which mentions Jesus and/or His apostles or members of the church meeting in a synagogue cannot be used to implicitly teach that Christians should “Remember the Sabbath to keep it holy” because the requirement observe the Sabbath was given only to the Israelites (Exodus 31:16-17).
The Silence of God’s Word
It is clear from the preceding outline that the bible not only teaches by implication, but also that application was an inspired method that Jesus and His Apostles used in teaching. However, as the title of this article suggest, we also must determine the role of silence in interpreting the Word of God. But how should we think about the silence of God’s Word? Does silence forbid? Does it permit? Does it sometimes forbid and sometimes permit? If the latter is true, how do we determine how to understand it in any given instance of silence? The second half of this article will address theses issues.

How Silence Differs From ImplicationIn any body of legislation such as the Bible, there is silence about an action where there is nothing whatsoever in that legislation about that action. However, if one or more statements in the legislation address the action in question, either explicitly or implicitly, positively or negatively, then that legislation is not silent about the action in question. In other words “silence” is the absolute absence of anything which addresses the issue. If, for example, a reader can point to even one passage in the Bible that addresses an action either directly or indirectly, then the Bible is not silent on that particular issue.

How Silence ForbidsAs will be noted below, Biblical silence is always prohibitive. To illustrate this principle, consider three grocery lists that three mothers give to their sons, along with the money they will need to purchase the items on their prospective lists:
    1. Grocery List #1
    Buy fruit
    Buy meat
    Buy 1 white potato
    Buy 1 box of cereal
These words authorize the son to buy apples and/or oranges and/or any of a whole array of fruits. By implication, the statement authorizes the purchase of apples and/or oranges, even though neither apples nor oranges are named on the list. This order says nothing about buying a loaf of white bread. It is possible that white bread will appear later on the list, and if it should, it would not contradict the command to buy fruit. It would simply add to what has already been ordered. It is also possible that there is nothing on the list about buying white bread. That is okay, too, as it does not contradict the order to buy fruit.

Analysis: The order to “buy fruit” allows the mother to add or not add an order to “buy white bread” without being in logical conflict with herself. Furthermore, we cannot tell from this order whether or not the mother did authorize the purchase of white bread. The statement has nothing to say explicitly or implicitly, positively or negatively, about the purchase of white bread. We cannot say this about the whole list, but so far, we can say that the list is silent about purchasing white bread and does not authorize such a purchase.

Notice in List #1 nothing is said about buying white bread. The mother is silent about it. Therefore, the purchase of white bread is not authorized.
    2. Grocery List #2
    Buy 12 ears of corn
    12 tomatoes
    1 loaf of bread
    3 T-bone steaks
Analysis: This list does have something about buying white bread. It does not specify or name white bread, but the phrase “Buy 1 loaf of bread” implicitly permits the purchase of a loaf of white bread. It would also allow the purchase a loaf of some other kind of bread, so long as only one loaf of bread is purchased. Notice that in the List #2 something is stated about buying white bread. Therefore the list is not silent concerning white bread.
    3. Grocery List #3
    Buy 1 loaf of white bread
    1 pound of cheese
    12 eggs
    1 package of hamburger
Analysis: This list also has something on it about buying white bread. It actually specifies it and thus it not only requires white bread, but also excludes pumpernickel and any other kind of bread.

What do we learn from the three lists?· List #2 and List #3 differ from List #1 in that they are not silent about buying white bread, whereas List #1 is silent about it.
· List #2 and List #3 differ from each other in that List #2 implicitly authorizes the purchase of white bread, while List #3 explicitly authorizes it.
· List #2 implicitly authorizes the purchase of a loaf of white bread, whereas List #1 does not authorize such a purchase. Because by its silence List #1 prohibits white bread, and because by its implication, list #2 allows white bread, and it is clear that silence and implication are two separate things. So implication is not an instance of silence.

A Precise Definition of Silence
As previously stated, an explicit statement or teaching of the Bible is found in the very words used in the Bible. An implicit statement or teaching of the Bible is a teaching that the reader can correctly deduce from the very words used in the Bible. Every “lawful action” (i.e., acceptable action) a Christian may take is authorized in Scripture either explicitly or implicitly (2 Peter 1:3-4; 2 Timothy 3:16-17). “Unlawful actions,” however, are forbidden in one of three ways: they are explicitly forbidden; they are implicitly forbidden; or Scripture is silent about the action (i.e.: says absolutely nothing either explicitly or implicitly).

Since God must authorize all that we do, when God does not authorize an action either explicitly, implicitly, or by His silence God addresses every human action in one of three ways:
    1) Forbids the action.
    2) Requires the action.
    3) Permits the action.
When taken together there are six possible kinds of legislation that spring from these principles. The Bible may forbid either explicitly or implicitly; the Bible may require either explicitly or implicitly; or the Bible may permit an action either explicitly or implicitly. While an action might fall into two categories (i.e., something might be authorized or forbidden both explicitly and explicitly), these are all the possibilities that can exist for any given action. Furthermore, all legislation of human action falls into at least one of these categories.

An action is authorized by the Bible if, and only if, a Bible passage or combination of passages either explicitly or implicitly requires or permits the action.

So what is silence? Precisely put, the Bible silence on an action when there is no Bible passage or combination of Bible passages that explicitly or implicitly teaches that the action is forbidden, required, or permitted.

Notice the difference between saying, “The Bible does not authorize this action,” verses saying, “The Bible is silent on this action.” If the Bible forbids an action, then the action is unauthorized because it is a Bible-addressed forbiddance. Example: “Do not forsake the assembling of yourselves together” (Hebrews 10:25). The Bible is not silent about this action. If you can point to a passage or combination of passages that forbids action, then you have shown that the Bible is not silent about this action. If the Bible is silent about an action, it is also true that the Bible does not authorize that action. No passage or passages will be found about such an action --- neither forbidding it, requiring it, nor permitting it.

· Therefore, “Bible-unauthorized actions” is a larger category than “Bible-addressed forbiddances” or “Bible-silent actions that are also unauthorized.”
· “Bible-unauthorized actions” includes all those actions which the Bible explicitly or implicitly forbids as well as those about which the Bible is silent.
· “Bible-silent actions” are a subset of “Bible-unauthorized actions."

This means that if you can find a Bible passage or combination of passages that teaches that actions not authorized by God are forbidden, then you will have shown that “Bible-silent actions” are forbidden.

The question remain: In addition to the logical fact that silence cannot authorize and that consequently, Bible -unauthorized actions consist of all Bible-addressed forbiddances plus all Bible-silent actions, does the Bible itself explicitly teach us how we are to regard this silence? Yes!

2 Timothy 3:16-17 and 1 Thessalonians 5:21 combine to teach us that Bible silence forbids. The first passage teaches, “All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work.” Note these words:
· “Complete
· “Thoroughly equipped
· “Every good work

This passage, in light of the noted words above, teaches that if Scriptures are silent about an action, if there is nothing in the Bible which teaches explicitly or implicitly that the action under consideration is good, the action cannot be good. This is so because the passage states that the Scriptures:
· Thoroughly equips us for every good work.
· Not every work, but every good work (includes both every and good, but not every alone)

In other words, the Scripture speak of themselves as being all-inclusive of all good works. So, if there is nothing in the Bible (neither implicit nor explicit) regarding a particular work --- that is, the Bible is silent about it --- then that work cannot be good.

Now, notice 1 Thessalonians 5:21 ---- “Test all things; hold fast what is good.” The word “test” is defined: “to test, examine, prove, scrutinize (to see whether a thing be genuine or not), as metals.” According to this passage we are to determine (“prove”) what is good, and do only that. When we put both passages together, we see:
· All good works are in Scripture (2 Timothy 3:16-17).
· If Scripture does not address a particular work (i.e., is silent about it), then the work cannot be good.
· We must do only what we have proved to be good (1 Thessalonians 5:21).
· If we do that which is not authorized by Scripture (where ALL good works are found), we violate 1 Thessalonians 5:21 and thus, we sin.

In other words, Bible silence forbids. Clearly silence is an intended means by which God conveys His will to mankind. This obviously indicates the necessity for careful and thorough studying of God’s Word (2 Timothy 2:15).

Now notice Colossians 3:17: “And whatever you do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God the Father through Him.” This passage refers to everything we do. This is revealed three times:
1) “Whatever you do,”
2) “In word or deed,” and
3) “Do all.”

Everything we do is to be done “in the name of the Lord Jesus.” In other words, all that we do is to be done by the authority of Jesus.

Where do we find Christ’s authority expressed? In the New Testament Scriptures (John 14:26; 16:13; 2 Timothy 3:16-17; Jude 3; 2 Peter 1:3). Since everything we do must be authorized by the New Testament, Colossians 3:17 refutes the “Bible silence permits” doctrine.

A couple of passages in Hebrews throw more light on the role of silence in establishing Biblical authority.

For He of whom these things are spoken belongs to another tribe, from which no man has officiated at the altar. For it is evident that our Lord arose from Judah, of which tribe Moses spoke nothing concerning priesthood” (Hebrews 7:13-14)

For if He were on earth, He would not be a priest, since there are priests who offer the gifts according to the law; who serve the copy and shadow of the heavenly things, as Moses was divinely instructed when he was about to make the tabernacle. For He said, ‘See that you make all things according to the pattern shown you on the mountain’ ” (Hebrews 8:4-5).

Note the words, “our Lord arose from Judah, of which tribe Moses spoke nothing concerning priesthood.” Since Jesus came from the tribe of Judah, and Moses said nothing about priests coming from this tribe, does this silence forbid? Was this adequate for concluding that according to the law, Christ would not be a priest? Notice how Hebrews 8:4-5 answers these questions. Obviously even in Old Testament times, silence forbade.

However, in spite of these evident facts, some have raised objections. Numerous passages have been suggested which supposedly teach that Bible silence permits or that sometimes permits. Let us consider a couple of these arguments. After presenting the argument, the explanation why the argument is invalid follows in the response.

Argument 1
The Old Testament is silent about synagogues. Yet passages like Matthew 4:23 show that Jesus approved of and worshipped in synagogues: “And Jesus went about Galilee, teaching in their synagogues, preaching the gospel of the kingdom, and healing all kinds of sickness and all kinds of disease among the people.” Therefore, silence obviously permits at least sometimes, because Jesus did not sin (Hebrews 4:15).

Response: The word “synagogue” literally means “to go with” and refers to a gathering of people, an assembly, and then the place where the assembly occurred --- the building. Did the Old Testament authorize assembling in a building for the activities in which Jesus and others engaged? In fact, the Old Testament implicitly authorizes exactly that. All we need to do is to find an Old Testament passage or combination of passages which requires the kinds of actions that were performed in a synagogue.

Gather My saints together to Me, those who have made a covenant with Me by sacrifice” (Psalms 50:5).
Give ear, O My people, to My law; Incline your ears to the words of My mouth” (Psalms 78:1)

These passages give explicit authority for assembling and implicit authority for a building. As we have learned, implication is not silence.

Argument 2
In 1988, in the Blakely-Highers debate over the use of instrumental music in worship, Givens Blakely took a new approach. Instead of arguing that the Word of God authorizes the use of instrumental music in worship, as Christian church preachers had done for 130 years, Blakely argued that there is no pattern at all for worship in the New Testament. So whatever a congregation wants to do is all right as long as they are sincere in their worship.

To that effect, he advanced this argument: There are a number of incidents in the Scripture where people are said to have worshipped our Lord Jesus Christ ... On one occasion a woman came in to out Lord, and without any authority whatsoever, without any Scriptural precedent, broke an alabaster box of ointment and poured it upon out Lord in honor and devotion to Him. While the disciples raised their ire because of this, He said “Let her alone, she has done a good deed Wherever the gospel is preached this shall be made mention of her.” All this occurs with no authorization whatsoever, no precedent whatsoever (p. 39).

Response: The passage in question reads, “And being in Bethany at the house of Simon the leper, as He sat at the table, a woman came having an alabaster flask of very costly oil of spikenard. Then she broke the flask and poured it on His head. But there were some who were indignant among themselves, and said, ‘Why was this fragrant oil wasted? For it might have been sold for more than three hundred denarii and given to the poor.’ And they criticized her sharply. But Jesus said, ‘Let her alone. Why do you trouble her? She has done a good work for Me. For you have the poor with you always, and whenever you wish you may do them good; but Me you do not have always. She has done what she could. She has come beforehand to anoint My body for burial.’ ” (Mark 14:3-8).

To begin with, where is “worship” in this passage? In verse 6, Jesus calls her action a “good work.” In verse 7, Jesus explains why He called her action a good work. Helping the poor is a good work, but ministering to Jesus is a good work also. Thus Jesus characterizes her behavior as beneficence. In verse 9, He identifies the purpose of her actions: to anoint His body for burial. Jesus was a worthy recipient of her generosity (Isaiah 53:7-9; Matthew 8:20). Is there no Scriptural precedence in the Old Testament Scripture for her behavior, as Blakely asserts? Do we have Old Testament Scripture which explicitly or implicitly covers what she did? YES!

Do not withhold good from those to whom it is due,
When it is in the power of your hand to do so
.” (Proverbs 3:27)

but you shall open your hand wide to him and willingly
lend him sufficient for his need, whatever he needs
.”
(Dueteronomy 15:8 --- concerning the poor)

Everyone helped his neighbor, And said to his brother,
‘Be of good courage!
’ ” (Isaiah 41:6)

[This is an approved example that God obviously wanted His people to emulate --- awb.]

These passages implicitly authorize what the woman did. She was not acting “without any authority whatsoever, without any Scriptural precedent” as Givens Blakely suggested.

There is a pattern for worship.
We must have explicit or implicit authority for all that we do in worship and for all we do anywhere. Bible silence does not and cannot give authority for anything. Therefore, Bible silence does not ever permit. Bible silence always forbids.

1718 Sylvan Way #802, Lodi, CA 95242, alanbonifay@comcast.net

Read more!

WHEN IS AN EXAMPLE BINDING?

by George Battey
Christian’s Expositor Journal Spring 2007


Preview of the Argument
This article argues that there is a clear distinction between a simple description of an event (account of action) and an example. These are not the same thing. Seven criteria, which will be presented must be met before an account of action may be classified as a binding example. These criteria are simple enough for even the most humble disciple to understand and apply without confusion. This article further shows that once an example has been located and identified, it is binding upon disciples today because of the very nature of what constitutes an example.

What Constitutes An Example?
What is an example? An example is more than an account of action. “So, because [Paul] was of the same trade, he stayed with [Aquila & Priscilla] and worked; for by occupation they were tentmakers” (Acts 18:3). Some might carelessly say, “This is an example of Paul working at a secular job.” Although the verse provides a description of how Paul worked a secular job, it is not a binding example upon all Christians. It simply describes an event and is thus not a binding example. An account of action simply tells information about what someone did, whether good or evil. It simply imparts information about what happened, hence the name, an “account of action.”

One must be careful about calling an account of action an “example.” The two are not the same. The dictionary gives the following three possible definitions of “example”:
(a) one that is representative of a group as a whole: the squirrel, an example of a
rodent;
(b) a punishment given as a warning or deterrent;
(c) a similar case that constitutes a model or precedent.
(American Heritage Dictionary, electronic version, 1996). Consider each of these definitions carefully.

A Representative
The first definition is “One that is representative of a group as a whole: the squirrel, an example of a rodent.” Scripture uses the word “example” like this. “My brethren, take the prophets, who spoke in the name of the Lord as an example of suffering and patience” (James 5:10). The inspired prophets are used here as representatives of a whole group of people who suffered for God.

One passage that seems to cause concern for many is the following: “If I then, your Lord and Teacher, have washed your feet, you also ought to wash one another’s feet. For I have given you an example, that you should do as I have done to you” (John 13:14-15). When Jesus washed the disciples’ feet, He gave us an item that was “representative of a group as a whole.” To illustrate, suppose a teacher wants to teach a science lesson about magnets. She tells the class, “Bring a magnet to school tomorrow. For example, bring a refrigerator magnet.” The teacher does not mean a refrigerator magnet is the only sort of magnet students can bring. She means a refrigerator magnet is “representative of a group of magnets as a whole.” Likewise, the Lord wanted disciples to perform acts of humility and acts of kindness toward one another. Washing feet was “representative of a group of actions as a whole.”

A Deterrent
The second definition is “a punishment given as a warning or deterrent.” Scripture uses “example” like this. “Now these things became our examples, to the intent that we should not lust after evil things as they also lusted . . . Now all these things happened to them as examples, and they were written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the ages have come” (1 Corinthians 10:6, 11). Here are punishments set forth as warnings to deter others from making the same mistakes.

A Model
The third definition for “example’ is “a similar case that constitutes a model or precedent.” The Webster Dictionary reads, “one that serves as a pattern to be imitated” (Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary, 1979).

Think carefully about this important definition. If an example is something that “serves as a pattern to be imitated,” it becomes obvious that an “example” is binding by its very nature. The action of the example must be “imitated.” All Bible examples are binding by their very nature. It is simply wrong to say, “No Bible example is binding.” Here is another statement that is wrong: “To say examples are binding results in confusion.” What is confusing about this? If something is a true “example” it is to be imitated. It is binding.

For to this you were called, because Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that you should follow His steps” (1 Peter 2:21). Here is Christ being held up as an “example” of how we should live. Would anyone dare say this example is not binding? Would anyone say this was confusing?

There are seven criteria which distinguish a simple “account of action” from an “example”:
1. Background command. True Bible “examples” must meet the test of a “background command.” The Law of Background Command says, “An account of action is binding only if it illustrates how to obey a previous command.”

Here is an illustration: “In the same manner He also took the cup after supper, saying, ‘This cup is the new covenant in My blood. This do, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of Me’’’ (1 Corinthians 11:25). Focus on the words “This do.’’ This means, “Do as I have done.” Here is a command to imitate the actions of the Lord. But there is more. “This do, as often as you drink it.” Christians are told to take the Communion often, but how often and when? “Now on the first day of the week, when the disciples came together to break bread...” (Acts 20:7). Thus, Acts 20:7 is a binding example because it illustrates how to obey a command found in 1 Corinthians 11:25.

Here is another illustration: "Then He took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, ‘Drink from it, all of you' " (Matthew 26:27). Here is a command, “Drink from it, all of you” All the disciples present are commanded to drink from one cup. Now see the example: “Then He took the cup, and when He had given thanks He gave it to them, and they all drank from it” (Mark 14:23). Thus, Mark 14:23 is a binding example of using one cup in the Lord’s Supper.

2. Apostolic Approval. True Bible examples must meet the test of apostolic approval. The Law of Apostolic approval says: “For an account of action to be binding, it must be approved by an inspired apostle.” Consider the following passage:

Now when Peter had come to Antioch, I withstood him to his face, because he was to be blamed; for before certain men came from James, he would eat with the Gentiles; but when they came, he withdrew and separated himself, fearing those who were of the circumcision. And the rest of the Jews also played the hypocrite with him, so that even Barnabas was carried away with their hypocrisy. But when I saw that they were not straightforward about the truth of the gospel, I said to Peter before them all, ‘If you, being a Jew, live in the manner of Gentiles and not as the Jews, why do you compel Gentiles to live as Jews?’” (Galatians 2:11-14).

Here is Peter acting like a hypocrite. Someone may say, “Here is apostolic approval --- an example of being a hypocrite.” No. This behavior was rebuked by Paul, another inspired apostle. Galatians 2:11-14 is merely “an account of action.” When an inspired apostle does something, and no rebuke is given, that action meets the test of apostolic approval.

Consider a previously used illustration: “Now on the first day of the week, when the disciples came together to break bread, Paul, ready to depart the next day, spoke to them and continued his message until midnight” (Acts 20:7). The background command for this example has already been noticed (1 Corinthians 11:25). The point to focus on now is that an inspired apostle approved the action by being present and by participating. No rebuke is ever given. This is a true binding example. Any congregation that does not require its members to gather on the first day of each week to break the bread is not entitled to wear the name “church of Christ”.

3. The Law of Unity. True Bible “examples” must meet the test of unity The Law of Unity says: “If something is to be considered an example, it must harmonize with all other Bible passages.” This is slightly different from the Law of Apostolic Approval. The Law of Apostolic Approval says there must be an apostle approving the action without any rebuke given. The Law of Unity says there must not be any contradiction whatsoever with other information revealed.

Acts 20:7-8 illustrates the Law of Unity “Now on the first day of the week, when the disciples came together to break bread, Paul, ready to depart the next day, spoke to them and continued his message until midnight. There were many lamps in the upper room where they were gathered together.” Here are two items:
(a) gathering on the first day to break bread and
(b) gathering in an upper room.

Focus on the upper room for a moment. Is this a binding example? People who try to justify themselves for not, using one cup like Jesus did, point to the “upper room” and attempt to show disciples do not have to follow that example and therefore do not have to follow the example of one cup. However, any attempt to bind the upper room, is futile because of the Law of Unity. The Law of Unity says no other passage may be contradicted. The passage contradicted in trying to bind the upper room is John 4:19-21:

The woman said to Him, ‘Sir, I perceive that You are a prophet. Our fathers worshiped on this mountain, and you Jews say that in Jerusalem is the place where one ought to worship’. Jesus said to her, ‘Woman, believe Me, the hour is coming when you will neither on this mountain, nor in Jerusalem, worship the Father.’”

Jesus, here, looses the place of worship. He is teaching that in the gospel age it does not matter where God’s people gather for worship. To argue that the upper room is binding for the Lords Supper is to contradict this passage. The upper room is not an example. It is merely an account of action. Remember, an example is an account of action that was intended as “a pattern to be imitated.” The upper room was not intended to be an example.

Although the upper room is not binding, weekly communion on the first day of the week is binding. “in the same manner He also took the cup after supper, saying, ‘This cup is the new covenant in My blood. This do, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of Me.’ For as often as you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death till He comes’” (1 Corinthians 11:25-26).

Acts 20:7 harmonizes with the idea of “frequently.” No other passage is contradicted. Therefore, Acts 20:7 passes the test of harmonizing with other passages. It passes the test of the Law of Unity.

4. The Law of Universal Application. True Bible examples must meet the test of universal application. The Law of Universal Application says, “Everything taught in the gospel of Christ must be within the realm of possibility for all people in all parts of the world in every age.” This law takes into consideration the fact that the gospel is intended for all people in all nations throughout all ages (Matthew 28:19; Mark 16:15).

Things which do not meet the test of universal application are the upper room (Mark 14:15), traveling to Jerusalem for worship (Dueteronomy 12:13-14), and taking an animal to a priest for sacrifice (Hebrews 8:4). Baptism in water for the remission of sins is, however, an example of the law of universal application. “So he commanded the chariot to stand still. And both Philip and the eunuch went down into the water, and he baptized him” (Acts 8:38). This is something that can be done by every person in every country throughout all time.

When I was a teenager, I went door-to-door in Wichita, Kansas, inviting people to study the Bible and come to church. I met a preacher who believed in sprinkling for baptism. He argued that immersion could not be a requirement for salvation. He asked, “What about someone who lives in the desert where there is not enough water to immerse? Are they going to be lost simply because they live in the desert?” I did not know what to say until later when an older brother wisely pointed out that people cannot live where there is not enough water to immerse. Water is essential for life. If there is not enough water for immersing someone, life cannot continue. Water is every where. Eighty percent of the earth is covered with water. Immersion for the remission of sins passes the test of the Law of universal application.

Weekly observance of the communion (Acts 20:7) passes the test of the Law of Universal Application. In other words, it is within the realm of possibility for every Christian in every country throughout all ages to observe the communion on the first day of each week.

One cup in communion (Mark 14:23) also meets this same criterion. Every Christian in every country throughout all ages has and will have access to one drinking vessel.

5. The Law of Essentiality. True Bible examples must meet the test of essentiality. The Law of Essentiality says, “The thing under consideration must be essential in performing the command. Incidental things are not relevant." Things which do not meet this test include:
· Where people are baptized --- whether in a natural stream, a lake, or an artificial pool What matters is that they are immersed for the remission of sins (Acts 2:38).
• Where Christians assemble for worship --- whether under a tree, in a rented building, or a private house. What matters is that they assemble for worship on the Lord’s day (Hebrews 10:25).
• The Shape and size of the communion cup --- whether the cup has handles or not, or what material the cup is made of. What matters is that the vessel is a drinking vessel called a “cup.”

Things which do pass the test of the Law of Essentiality include:

• One cup in communion (Mark. 14:23; I Corinthians 11:25). Many times digressive preachers argue the container is an “incidental matter.” But when asked, “Do we have to have a cup?” they answer, “Of course you have to have a cup because the fruit of the vine is a liquid; so you have to have a container of some sort." If a container is essential (a have-to-have item), then it cannot be at the same time an incidental matter.
• Communion on the first day of the week (Acts 20:7). Weekly observance of the Lord’s Supper is essential to fulfill the command to observe communion frequently (1 Corinthians 11:25). Once again Acts 20:7 passes yet another test of a true binding example --- the Law of Essentiality.
• Much water for baptism (John 3:23). Baptism is called a burial (Romans 6:3-4) and therefore requires much water.

6. The Law of Competence. True Bible examples must meet the test of competence. The Law of Competence says, “There must be Scripture which is competent to support the conclusion drawn.”

To illustrate this consider Acts 16:33: “He took them the same hour of the night and washed their stripes And immediately he and all his family were baptized.” This passage is used by Pedobaptists to support infant baptism. But is this passage competent to support the conclusion drawn? No. There is no mention of infants whatsoever, there are many families with no infants. Pedobaptists are making an unnecessary assumption with this passage.

Consider once again the information found in Acts 20:7: “Now on the first day of the week, when the disciples came together to break bread ...” Is this passage competent to prove weekly communion on the first day of the week? Yes. If it did not matter to God, no time element would be mentioned at all. In such a case, time and frequency would not matter. Christians could have communion whenever they desired and as frequently or infrequently as they choose. If God wanted Communion to be a yearly event, a certain day of a certain month would have been specified. For example, God wanted the Passover to be a yearly feast. He specifically said it was to be observed on the fourteenth day of the first month (Leviticus 23:5). This means every year, once a year. It mattered to God when and how often this was observed. If God wanted communion to be a monthly event, a certain day of the month would be specified, but no certain month would be specified. For example, Numbers 28:14 and Numbers 29:6 speak of the offerings that were to be offered on the “new moon’’ day of the month. This means every month, once a month. It mattered to God when and how often this was observed. If God wanted communion to be a weekly event, a certain day of the week would be specified. Leviticus 23:3 speaks of rest on the Sabbath day. It was to be on the seventh day of the week. This meant every week, once a week. It mattered to God when and how often this was observed

Acts 20:7 say’s “on the first day of the week” the disciples came together to break bread. This is competent to prove communion is to be observed weekly --- every first day of week.

7. The Law of Limited Application. True Bible examples must meet the test of Limited Application. The Law of Limited Application says, “A passage can be applied only to the circumstances which the Holy Spirit applied them to originally.”

The Sabbath day will be used to illustrate this law The Sabbath day was given only to Israelites. “Therefore the children of Israel shall keep the Sabbath, to observe the Sabbath throughout their generations as a perpetual covenant. It is a sign between Me and the children of Israel forever; for in six days the LORD made the heavens and the earth, and on the seventh day He rested and was refreshed.” (Exodus 31:16-17). This passage explicitly teaches that the Sabbath was a sign between the nation of Israel and God. To take the Sabbath and apply it to everyone in the world is to violate the Law of Limited Application, because the Holy Spirit Himself limited this command to the Israelites.

Other laws can be used to illustrate the Law of Limited Application. The laws of animal sacrifice are applicable (limited) only to men living under the Old Testament. The Old Law has now been “nailed to the cross” (Colossians 2:14), and these laws no longer apply. The law of baptism is applicable (limited) only to alien sinners --- people who need their sins washed away (Acts 22:16). The Law of confessing sins and praying is applicable (limited) only to Christians --- people who may call God their “Father” (Matthew 6:9; 1 John 1:8-10). Acts 20:7 is limited to disciples of the New Testament dispensation: “Now on the first day of the week, when the disciples came together to break bread ...” It is disciples who must keep this example, not unbelievers. Disciples who do not assemble will answer on Judgment Day. “Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as is the manner of some, but exhorting one another, and so much the more as you see the Day approaching” (Hebrews 10:25). When brethren use Acts 20:7 to teach weekly communion, such usage passes the test of Limited Application because brethren limit the passage to the very same group of people to which it was originally addressed --- the disciples of Christ.

Conclusion
We have pointed out the difference between an account of action and a binding example. For an action to qualify as an example, it must meet seven criteria:
1. Background command.
2. Apostolic approval.
3. Law of Unity.
4. Universal Application.
5. Law of Essentiality.
6. Law of Competence.
7. Law of Limited Application.


An example is binding by virtue of the fact that it is an example. When properly used, an example is an action “that serves as a pattern to be imitated.” All New Testament examples are binding, and because they are binding, the Lord’s church insists on the following:

· Communion observed on the first day of every week (Acts 20:7)
· Only one loaf and one cup in communion (Mark 14:22-23; 1 Corinthians 10:17).
· All leaders of the church must be male (2 Timothy 2:2; 1 Timothy 2:8).
· Women must limit their teaching to the home (Acts 18:26; 21:8-9; 1 Timothy 2:11,12; 1 Corinthians 14:34-35).
· All assemblies of the church must gather the disciples into one place --- undivided and unclassified (1 Corinthians 14:26; Acts 15:30)
· A plurality of men to serve as elders in the church rather than a single man ruling (Acts 14:23; 1 Peter 5:1-3)
· The church treasury is used only for the saints (Acts 11:29; 1 Corinthians 16:1-2).
· Baptism by immersion in water only (Acts 8:38).


17 Woodland Ave., Hampton, Georgia 30228, ffbattey@yahoo.com

Read more!

Thursday, November 1, 2007

Biblical References To Command, Example And Necessary Inference

When There Is No Precept, Approved Example, Or Necessary Inference That Includes The Practice Under Consideration, Then There Is No Scriptural Authority For The Practice - The Practice Is Not Acceptable To God In Christian Worship!

Let's examine the three methods of establishing the validity of our Christian practices. Although Examples occur so often that substantiation seems hardly necessary, a few illustrations in respect to:


COMMANDS:
Jesus said, "These things I command you, that you love one another." (John 15:17)

Paul instructed Timothy, "These things command and teach."
(1 Timothy 4:11)

EXAMPLES:
Jesus Himself exemplified the observance of the Lord's supper for us on the night He was betrayed. (Matthew 26:26-29; Mark 14:22-24; Luke 22:14-20; 1 Corinthians 11:23-29)

Peter said, "To this you were called, because Christ suffered for you, leaving you an example, that you should follow in His steps." (1 Peter 2:21)

Paul, referring to God's Judgment against idolatrous Israelites, warned us that "all these things happened unto them for examples."(1 Corinthians 10:6)

NECESSARY INFERENCES:
As for Necessary Inferences: In His reply to the Sadducees trick question concerning the Levite law, Jesus Necessarily Inferred that Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob were still living somewhere, even though there physical deaths had occurred centuries before. (Matthew 22:22-32)

In Acts 15:12, Luke Necessarily implies that the miracles and wonders wrought by Paul and Barnabus among the Gentiles proved that God had accepted the Gentiles as proper candidates for conversion upon the same basis that He did the Jews. In other words, without being made to keep the Law of Moses, or any of its provisions.

In 1 Corinthians 11:26, Paul necessarily implies the use of one cup in the observance of the Lord's Supper by using the figure of speech called metonymy in the phrase "drink this cup".

Finally, in Hebrew 7:14, the writer necessarily implies that Jesus could not be a priest on earth because it is evident our Lord sprang out of Judah, about which tribe Moses spoke nothing about the priesthood."

The point of these illustrations is that We Establish Bible Authority By Command, Example, And Necessary Inference Not Because Anyone Else Does Or Does Not Do It This Way, But Because That Is Exactly How Jesus And The Apostles Applied Their Lines Of Argumentation In The Record Of The New Testament!

· Are There Differences Between Commands, Exhortation, And Principles?There are subtle differences between these words, but generally they have the same meaning: to give an order to; to direct with authority. When the reference is of giving of orders, the command implies a formal command of absolute authority, as by a sovereign or military leader. Synonyms include: PRECEPT, DIRECT, INSTRUCT, ENJOIN, or CHARGE. There are at least eight different Greek words that essentially have the same meaning as our English words, which are translated command!

A PRECEPT is a commandment or direction meant as a rule of action. Precepts are the direct commands, rules, regulations, codes, or requirements of Scripture.

To EXHORT means to admonish or to urge someone to pursue some coarse of conduct. It is always prospective, looking toward the future. In contrast to the meaning of COMFORT, which looks backward, having to do with a trial or experience. EXHORTATION also carries with it the idea of advice, with strong warning or encouraging some action on the part of the hearer.

PRINCIPLES may be either rules of conduct or a fundamental law, doctrine, or motivating force on which others are based. Principles are the underlying truths that are the basis and reason for the PRECEPTS. A principle is a standard of truth that may be applied to more than one situation. Principles further help to explain the "why" behind the precept. Never-the -less principles are also commands.

The Relationships Between Precepts & Principles
The precepts governing our worship of God are discovered in such passages John 4:23-24, "They that worship God must worship Him in spirit and truth"; Hebrews 10:25, "Not forsaking the assembly of ourselves together"; 1 Corinthians 11:23-29, "Let every one of you lay by in store".

The broader principles underscoring these specific precepts are found in passages like Matthew 6:33, "Seek ye first the kingdom of God"; Ephesians 5:15-16, "Redeem the time"; 2 Timothy 3:1, "Be ready unto every good work"; 2 Timothy 10:12, "Take heed lest you fall"; Ephesians 6:10, "Be strong in the lord"; Mark 8:34, "Deny self"; Matthew 5:13-16, "Let your light so shine before men"; James 14:15, "Love God".

Whatever differences may be construed between command, example, and necessary inference, it must be recognizes that the object of all three is to make action obligatory.

In determining whether or not a specific imperative is bound upon us today we must first determine the writer's purpose. All of the rules of interpretation must be correctly applied to the passage.

· Is It Possible For The Meaning Or Sentiment Behind A Command To Be Authoritative And Not The Command Itself?

In general, no. This notion derives from a supposed distinction between "the spirit" and "the letter" of the law. In 2 Corinthians 3:6, says "He has made us competent as ministers of a New Covenant - not of the letter, but of the spirit; for the letter kills, but the spirit gives life." The whole notion of a distinction between the rule and the rule itself is a complete fiction. Contextually in 2 Corinthians 3 the "letter that kills" is the ministration of death written on "tablets of stone" (vs 3:3, 7), in other words the ten commandments, or the Old Testament Law! That "which gives life" is Grace, or the Law of Christ, or the New Testament Law. One cannot obey the meaning or sentiment behind the commands without obeying the command itself!

Do Specific Commands Prohibit Us From Similar Actions?
Specifically does 1 Corinthians 16:1-2 which gives us an example of the collection on the first day of the week prohibit collection on any other day? Yes. Does the example in Acts 20:7, explaining how often the church gathered for the communion prohibit us from observing the Lord's Supper on any other day than the first day of the week? Of coarse it does. The church is instructed by the example of 1 Corinthians 16:1-2 that the contribution is to be a weekly part of the Lord's Day worship, and not some other time.

This arrangement was legislated in order to avoid having to have an emergency collection. If an emergency should arise, an individual, or a group of individuals, each acting on their own initiative could do whatever is consummate with the rest of the New Testament. The collective "body" of Christ is to participate in the collection only on the first day of the week.

How Are We To Determine Which Commands Are Universal For All People Of All Times And All Ages, And Which Are Situations Commands For A Particular People And A Particular Circumstance?
The only possible answer to this question is that the purpose of the New Testament writers and the surrounding context must be evaluated in each case in order to determine which commands are situational and which are universal.

Two passages in particular were suggested as relevant to this inquiry: 1 Corinthians 16:1-2 was one of them. The question is whether or not the contribution was a universal command, and consequently binding today, or a situational command to meet a temporary need, and therefore temporary in nature and not mandatory today. The objectors to this passage being construed as universal point out that this collection was for a specific need, the poor saints in Judea. When the need was satisfied the order ended, they reason.

1 Corinthians 16:1, 4 is binding today, but it is binding as an EXAMPLE, not as a command. It illustrates how and when the church collects the money to obey a variety of commands having to do with the financial support of: preachers, elders, "widows indeed", needy saints, or any other prescribed by the New Testament scriptures that mandate a need of money for the collective "body of Christ" (the local congregation) to obey (there are specific area of private giving commanded in the New testament). This takes away the whole concernation about whether this is temporary or not. The passage is to be understood in the same way as Acts 20:7. The example illustrates BACKGROUND RULES.

John 13:14-15, concerning washing feet. Whether or not we are commanded to wash feet today. As a matter of ritual ceremony, no. Jesus plainly said their feet were dirty and needed to be washed. Jesus did this as a graphic illustration of the same lesson He had taught the Apostles on many other occasions. Like here, they were arguing about who should be greatest in the kingdom of heaven.

The key verse that removes this from a ceremonial cleansing is John 13:10. It never was a ceremonial or ritual cleansing. Are we commanded to wash feet today? Yes! If a fellow Christian needs that service performed for them, yes. Are we commanded to do it ceremonially, as a part of the Lord's Supper? Of coarse not. It never was done ceremonially in this way, or any other. Is this example more for than just washing feet? Yes. What did Jesus do? He humbled Himself for the sake of another

Can Emotions Be Commanded?
1 Thessalonians 5:16 and Philippians 4:6 say "Be joyful always" and "Be anxious for nothing". The question is whether or not emotions ca be commanded? In a word, yes! The command "Be joyful always" is remarkable in view of the suffering the Thessalonians had already experienced. The remarkable part of this command is the emphatic "ALWAYS". Paul held this rejoicing at all times and in all circumstances as distinctive and "abiding" characteristic of the Christians. Paul knew that suffering for the Lord was not incompatible with rejoicing in the Lord. He could testify himself to the paradoxical experience of joy amid sorrow and suffering.

His explanation of this paradox is found in Romans 8:18, "For I consider that the suffering of the present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory that shall be revealed in us." Jesus explained in Philippians 4:6, "Be anxious for nothing" on His sermon on the mount in Matthew 6:24-34. Paul provides the interactive to "anxious worry over things that we cannot control" in the same verse under question, when he says, "But in every thing by prayer and supplication, with thanksgiving, let your requests be made known to God".

The New Testament commands emotions all the time: LOVE, FEAR, JOY, PEACE, HATE, etc. It commands the actions that bring about these emotions. James 5:13-14, "If any afflicted let him pray; if any happy? Let him sing songs of praise. Is any of you sick? Let him call the elders ..." The question is, if we are happy and do not sing songs of praise; are afflicted and do not pray; are sick and do not call for the elders, do we violate these commands?

As the precept concerning singing songs when cheerful does not imply that we are not to pray when we are happy (1 Thessalonians 5:17; 1 Timothy 2:8; James 5:16). So, the precepts concerning prayer and affliction do not imply that we are not to express our joy in suffering according to the will of God (singing songs as did Paul and Silas in the jail, Philippians 16:25).

The question here in James 5, "Let him pray", as opposed to what? If you look at the context, it describes rich men who are oppressing mercilessly, even killing people, refusing to pay their wages, etc. In verse 12 Paul says they are "to pray" as opposed to “swearing"; verse 8, "brethren be patient"; verse 9, "establish your hearts"; verse 10-11, "grudge not one against another"; verse 12, ""above all do not swear and curse"; verse 13ยช14, "instead, when you are afflicted pray, when you are happy sing, when you are sick call for the elders ...".

PROPER INTERPRETATION always involves studying the authors PURPOSE and observing the contextual considerations.
If it be established that one must follow this pattern, or that this is the pattern to be followed in each case of affliction, happiness, or sickness, that in no way impinges on the necessity of Christians to obey God's Word in other areas! It would simply constitute one more obligation to be met, and a possible inconsistency in our own actions that needs to be corrected. It would not lessen out responsibilities to worship according to the New Testament pattern one iota. The same thing hold true for the "holy kiss"

EXAMPLES
Jesus said, "I have given you an example, that you should do as I have done unto you. I tell you the truth, no servant is greater than his master, nor is a messenger greater than the one who sent him. now that you know these things, you will be blessed if you do them", John 13:15-17.

1) What Is An Example?Webster's Dictionary defines an example as: "An instance serving for illustration for a principle or method"; "A particular case or problem illustrating a general rule, or truth". In other words, an example is an illustration, clarification, explanation, or application of a background rule, or rules.

An example differs from an instance, happenstance, or occurrence, in that all of those simply report action and they do not carry binding authority. An example by it's very nature is binding because of it's relationship to the rule, or rules, it illustrates. If an incident can be demonstrated to be an example, the it is binding.

2) Why Are Examples Considered In Interpreting Scripture?
They are considered because they are normative (the standard of conduct to be imitated), and because the New Testament teaches us by examples. Acts 20:7 illustrates the principle of 1 Corinthians 11:26, "For as often as you eat this bread and drink this cup, you do show the lord's death until He comes." How often did they eat that bread and drink that cup? Acts 20:7, gives the example of when, “... Upon the first day of the week."

Therefore it is incumbent for all congregations to observe the Lord's Supper on the first day of the week. 1 Corinthians 16:12 constitutes an example illustrating how churches are to collect money to obey the commands regulating the churches financial obligations. The fact that the disciples were in the upper room when the Lord's Supper was instituted is not binding because it does not illustrate a rule, therefore it is not an example. It is simply an incident reported about the occasion. All examples are binding. The question is whether or not an example can be deduced from a particular incident. If it is an example, it is binding!

NECESSARY INFERENCE
1) What Constitutes A Necessary Inference?
First let's understand what a necessary implication is. It is the conclusion gained from evidence, without actually being stated directly. When I am speaking to you, I imply something. When you are listening, you infer what you hear. If you say, "I'm going to get a cup of coffee", you imply that you are going to stop what you're doing, at least momentarily, to get some coffee, although you haven't specifically said that. But, we must be very sure first, that the point under consideration is one that is fairly implied by the statements of scripture, and not merely read into scripture for our-selves. That is, inferred with warrant from the text.

2) What Is Fairly Implied In Scripture Must Be Necessarily Implied.
In other words, is it essential to understanding, or necessary that the implication be recognized? If so, the necessary implication is binding upon us today. Jesus and the apostles taught by necessary inference. In Matthew 22:22-32 Jesus necessarily implied that Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob are still alive - somewhere.

In Matthew 22:41, from the fact that Jesus was David's son and that David called Him Lord, we are to infer that both the humanity and deity of Jesus. In Matthew 11:3-5, Jesus answers John's question as to whether or not He was the Messiah. He did it by necessary implication. He didn't say "Yes, I'm the Messiah." He said, "Go back and tell John you have seen the lame walk, the deaf hear, and the blind see ... and the Gospel preached to the poor."

In Matthew 8:21, the passage can only be understood by inferring that the "dead" who are to bury the "dead" are spiritually dead and not physically dead.

In Matthew 4:7, when Jesus replied to Satan's temptation (when Satan quoted another verse of scripture about casting himself off the temple) was, "It is also written, 'do not put God to the test'". The reader is to infer necessarily that one scripture cannot be arrayed against another, but rather must be reconciled one with another.

In Hebrews 7:14, Paul necessarily implies that Christ could not be a priest on earth because He came from Judah, "About which Moses spoke nothing as concerning the priesthood". The New Testament authoritatively instructs us today on the use of necessary inference. It is necessarily implied in Acts 8:37 that the preaching Jesus requires is the preaching of baptism as a condition of salvation. Paul's statement that he had "determined not to know anything while I was with you except Jesus Christ, and Him crucified", in 1 Corinthians 2:2. This necessarily implies that at least all the material covered in 1 Corinthians is preaching nothing but Jesus Christ, and Him crucified; and probably it covers all that Paul wrote.

Weekly observance of the Lord's supper is necessarily implied in Acts 20:7. That one unleavened loaf of bread is to be used in the observance of the Lord's supper is necessarily implied in Matthew 26:17 & 26 and the by commands for conducting the Passover during which it was instituted. The mandatory use of one cup in the Lord's table is necessarily implied by 1 Corinthians 11:26, and by a careful study of the Passover and the other related verses.

3) How Do We Determine Which Passages Fall Into The Category Of Necessary Inferences?

By the careful study of every passage of the subject under consideration; by maintaining proper observance of the authors intended purpose; by careful attention to the context; by the correct application of all the rules of Hermeneutics; and by examining each case in it's own right.

KINDS OF AUTHORITY:
1. GENERAL (generic): God has given us a general requirement, without a specification being made as to how it must be carried out.
Example: A parent tells their child to put on some "clothes". They then have the option of putting on “any” shirt, pants, dress, shoes, socks, etc. they want.

2. SPECIFIC: God has given a requirement which is distinguished as being different from others in the same class or group of items.
Example: The parent tells a child to put on a particular shirt, pants, dress, shoes, socks, etc. This ”specific ”order eliminates all other articles of the category or class (clothes).

Illustrations Of The "”Two Kinds Of Authority":
GENERAL SPECIFIC
Automobile:
Automobile:Chevy, Ford, Olds, Any other Ford

An order for an "automobile" A specific order for a "Ford"
would include any kind. excludes any other kind.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Go" (Apostles) "Go" (Apostles) by Boat
Walk, Donkey, Boat, any other

Includes any method. A specific order, "boat",
excludes all other methods.

GENERAL SPECIFIC
"Eat" "Eat Bread”
Beef, Peanut , Jelly, Bread & A specific order for "bread"
Butter excludes all other foods.
Includes all kinds of foods

Expedients:
When we have a general requirement like "Go" how we "go" is an “expedient”, is just a means of achieving the "Go". How we go doesn't matter, as long as it isn't going against scripture somewhere else, example: to steal a boat would be against God's will, because stealing is set forth as a sin in the Bible.

Definition of an expedient: a means of achieving something; suitable for a particular purpose (in this context: suitable for God's purpose; within God's authority). NOT “RIGHT OR WRONG”, because God has no preference; therefore man has the right to choose for himself!

Problems of expedients:
1. Some things are black & white
command - Romans 13:9

2. Some things are not black or white.

Examples of expedients:
Circumcision - 1 Cor. 7:19 = God doesn't care

Eating of meats sacrificed, 1 Cor. 8:7-8 =God doesn't care.

COMMAND TO EAT “bread” (Lord's Supper) = a specific requirement

bread; meat; bread & jelly = same class (food)

This means that none other of this type (food) may be substituted, no tacos, steak, etc. In this case the example was UNLEAVENED, UNBROKEN BREAD (because of the Passover feast and all that it represented about Christ).

COMMAND TO “drink("fruit of the vine" = grapes) = specific requirement

"grape juice"; wine; milk; coke = same class (“drink”)

This means that no other “drink” may be substituted in place of the “fruit of the vine” (grapes). The fact that this was done during the Passover again limits this to grape-juice because there was no “leavening” allowed during that period.

COMMAND “do this(“He took the cup” - singular) = specific requirement

"one cup"; as the example eliminates any other options.

This means that no more than one cup can be used when the congregation partakes of the Lord’s Supper because of the command couples with the example given to us by Jesus. Jesus then explained why, “This cup is the New Testament in my blood”. In other words it represents the New Covenant we have with God, verses the one the Jews has through Moses.

BAPTISM
Several differnt type of baptisms are mentioned in the Bible.
Ephesians 4:5 says there is “One baptism”; which one is for today?

WATER BAPTISM - Command: Acts 2:38; Mark 16:16; Example: Acts 8:26-39; 9:18; 16:15, 33; Necessary Inference: Acts 10:47-48; Purpose: Acts 2:38; 22:16; Romans 6:3-5; 1 Corinthians 12:15; Galatians 3:27-28; Colossians 2:12-13; Titus 3:5; 1 Peter 3;21

HOLY SPIRIT BAPTISM - (Command:Acts 1:5; Example: Acts 2:4, Acts 2:38; Necessary Inference:Acts 8:9-19);

BAPTISM BY FIRE - Testing: 1 Corinthians 3:13; Judgement: Matthew 3:11-12; Luke 3:16-17; Revelation 20:15 ;

= Bible definition = “immersion” ,= same class

running water; Lake; Baptistery = CONTAINER = expedient > different class

As you strive to understand the will of God, remember these fundamental truths: The Bible is the Word of God Almighty; In The Word Of God Is The Truth; The Truth, God's Word, Constitutes The Will Of God For Man; God's Will Is Written Down In Human Language So That Men Can Know The Truth And Be Able To Understand What God's Will For Man Requires. The process of understanding what the will of the Lord is, is called the interpretation of Scripture, or Hermeneutics. God expects us to practice such interpretation. God expects man to discern and obey His will.



Compiled and Edited by P. Dennis Crawford

References

1. Jim Putterbaugh, Camino, CA, 1993
2. Don Pruit, Manteca, CA, New Years Meeting 1997
3. Glen Osburn, Placerville, CA, 1995
4. Greg DeGolf, Labor Day Meeting 1997
5. Alfred L. Newberry, “The Divine Pattern Advocate,” 2nd Ed., 1994

Read more!

What did you think of this site?

Please send me any Suggestions, comments or questions. Thanks

My Photo
Dennis Crawford
At one time I was an Agnostic/atheist, not much caring if God existed or not. Then one day I was challenged to examine the evidences of God and the Bible. These are the basic truths I as "Just a Christian" am trying to share with others on these blog-sites: 1) To provide the “evidences” for God and the creation, the infallibility of the Scriptures, and for Jesus Christ as the Lord and savior of mankind. [Hebrews 11:1] 2) To reach the lost with the complete Gospel of Christ and salvation. [Romans 1:16; 2:16; 5:19-20; Galatians 1:7; 2 Thessalonians 1:8-9] 3) To help Christians to grow in their knowledge and faith and the grace of God, and commitment to following Christ. [1 Peter 2:2] 4) To promote and defend the unity of church and the doctrine of Christ. [Mark 7:7-9; John 10:16; Ephesians 4:4-5; 1 Corinthians 1:10] Please e-mail me at BibleTruths@hotmail.com with any comments or suggestions. Thanks, DC
View my complete profile