tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6875456896695619262011-07-30T23:19:23.792-07:00Eagle Eyehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01023943490457702099noreply@blogger.comBlogger61100tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-687545689669561926.post-43092425466252090062010-02-08T20:58:00.010-08:002010-02-08T21:16:55.878-08:00

Using the Methods Taught By Jesus Christ and His ApostlesSection 1 of 4 Parts· Why Should We Study The Bible?“Study to show yourself approved unto God,a worker who does not need to be ashamed,rightly dividing the Word of truth.”2 Timothy 2:15 The verse quoted here in 2 Timothy 2:15 indicates that God expects His people to “study” His Word to rightly discern His Truths. It also indicates by

Eagle Eyehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01023943490457702099noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-687545689669561926.post-29384077097956598962010-02-08T20:58:00.009-08:002010-02-08T21:19:51.205-08:00

COVENANT WITH ISRAELA covenant is an agreement. God made an agreement with the descendants of Jacob. The Law given through Moses, including the Ten Commandments, is the written record of that agreement. “The LORD our God made a covenant with us at Horeb. The LORD did not make this covenant with our fathers, but with us, those who are here today, all of us who are alive.” (Dueteronomy 5:2-3). The

Eagle Eyehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01023943490457702099noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-687545689669561926.post-34573213903142611962010-02-08T20:58:00.007-08:002010-02-08T21:18:58.100-08:00

by Don FrenchIS THE LAW OF MOSES STILL IN EFFECT?Galatians 4:21-311) Which law did the bondwoman and her son represent?2) Which law did the freewoman and her son represent?3) Which son represents Christians?4) What was to be done with the bondwoman and her son?5) Which son was to inherit everything?Jeremiah 31:311) What Did Jerimiah say about a “new covenant”?Matthew 5:17-181) Did Christ come to

Eagle Eyehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01023943490457702099noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-687545689669561926.post-39010156580941483392010-02-08T20:58:00.005-08:002010-02-08T21:20:39.708-08:00

When There Is No Precept, Approved Example, Or Necessary Inference That Includes The Practice Under Consideration, Then There Is No Scriptural Authority For The Practice - The Practice Is Not Acceptable To God In Christian Worship!Let's examine the three methods of establishing the validity of our Christian practices. Although Examples occur so often that substantiation seems hardly necessary,

Eagle Eyehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01023943490457702099noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-687545689669561926.post-85725065174461122662010-02-08T20:58:00.003-08:002010-02-08T21:21:31.653-08:00

by George BatteyChristian’s Expositor Journal Spring 2007Preview of the ArgumentThis article argues that there is a clear distinction between a simple description of an event (account of action) and an example. These are not the same thing. Seven criteria, which will be presented must be met before an account of action may be classified as a binding example. These criteria are simple enough for

Eagle Eyehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01023943490457702099noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-687545689669561926.post-69269667840379166102010-02-08T20:58:00.001-08:002010-02-08T21:22:25.662-08:00

Alan BonifayChristian’s Expositor Journal Spring 2007The Bible Teaches by Implication: Defining the TermsIt is popular in some circles to deny that the Bible teaches by implication. This view suggests that implications are the product of human reasoning, and therefore cannot be considered as equivalent to, or part of God’s Word. In other words, this view says that only those things which the

Eagle Eyehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01023943490457702099noreply@blogger.com0